One of the ways in which the UN (ISO) will bring in their
universal identification regulations and overseeing global government, will be to extend the public fear, and
create the need "in the name of public safety" for a parent state, which is
the first stage of a police state.
The exaggerated "Terrorism threat" has not worked in
many European countries (which have seen real war) and has only been of moderate
success in North America; though this did not stop the Canadian government from
forking over 7.7 Billion to our secretive police "intelligence" agency, and the
creation of the new "Public Safety" ministry (which our government had
authority to create, via the BNA Act).
What we are seeing now is a dramatic increase in the
numbers of NEW and anti-biotic resistant forms of Viruses, many of which are
being "found" in our 'food source' livestock and crops.
Is this merely coincidence, or does it fit a disturbing
pattern of supportive evidence of a possible human based origin? Is there any
evidence that these new pathogens are being released into our environment for
the purpose of creating yet another "public safety" concern?
Governments, their puppet military and secret
police, are never quick to give away such secrets; but an interesting clue has
recently surfaced surrounding one powerful clue that all of us (including our
children) are in fact the
target of the latest terrorist attack - and the terrorists are our own
Now that he is officially sworn in as the new head of the
Central Intelligence Agency, Gen. Michael Hayden plans to build a vast domestic
spying network that will pry into the lives of most Americans around the clock
Nestled near the Hamptons, the fashionable summer
playground of America's rich and famous, and in the shadow of New York City,
lies an unimposing 840-acre island unidentified on most maps. On the few on
which it can be found, Plum Island is marked red or yellow, and stamped U.S.
government—restricted or dangerous animal diseases. Though many people live the
good life within a scant mile or two from its shores, few know the name of this
pork chop–shaped island. Even fewer can say whether it is inhabited, or why it
doesn't exist on the map. That's all about to change.
Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government's Secret Plum Island Germ
Laboratory blows the lid off the stunning true nature and checkered history of
Plum Island. It shows that the seemingly bucolic island on the edge of the
largest population center in the United States is a ticking biological time bomb
that none of us can safely ignore.
Based on innumerable declassified government documents, scores of in-depth
interviews, and access to Plum Island itself, this is an eye-opening,
suspenseful account of a federal government germ laboratory gone terribly wrong.
For the first time, Michael
Christopher Carroll's book "Lab 257" takes you deep inside this secret world and presents
startling revelations including virus outbreaks, biological meltdowns, infected
workers who were denied assistance in diagnosis by Plum Island brass, the
periodic flushing of contaminated raw sewage into area waters, and the insidious
connections between Plum Island, Lyme disease, and the deadly 1999 West Nile
Study needed to "head off" next epidemic, scientists
say - September 18, 2004
By TOM PAULSON,
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
University of Washington scientists plan to infect monkeys with a
killer flu virus grown from tissue exhumed from victims of the 1918
They hope the insight they gain will unravel the mystery of why tens
of millions of people worldwide died from the virulent flu strain and
lead to development of better vaccines and drugs that may save lives
in the future.
"This was the most deadly infectious disease in the history of
mankind, killing at least 40 million people," said Dr. Michael Katze,
a UW microbiologist and principal investigator for the local arm of
"To this day, nobody understands why the virus was so deadly."
"Most experts believe" another killer flu pandemic is overdue,
said, so it's critical to gain information about the disease.
The UW received part of a $12.7 million grant, funded largely from
Congress' $1.7 billion biodefense appropriation to the National
Institutes of Health, to collaborate on the 1918 flu study with Mount
Sinai School of Medicine in New York and the Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology in Washington, D.C.
A sceptic of resurrecting and enlivening the 1918 flu virus, however,
said it is critical to first make sure we are adequately protected
against creating a "man-made" pandemic.
"This project could create a new bug that infects someone in the lab
who then walks out at the end of the day and, literally, kills tens of
millions of people," said Ed Hammond, director of a biotechnology and
bioweapons watchdog organization called the Sunshine Project, based in
Although Hammond said he could accept the noble intentions of the UW
scientists, he noted that there are no national laboratory standards
for dealing with this particular virus.
The lack of regulatory protection, he said, stems from the fact that
influenza is generally regarded as a fairly routine disease.
"But this organism, the 1918 virus, is something else," Hammond said.
"It's very dangerous and easily spread."
He contended that the 1918 virus deserves one of the highest levels of
laboratory containment systems, known as Biosafety Level 3 Ag --
so-called because the criteria were set by the U.S. Department of
The only greater level of protection (in which lab workers don
self-contained "moon suits" inside a pressurized, air-locked,
multilayered lab) is Biosafety Level 4.
The first step in this project will be to spend about $300,000 of the
grant to beef up the biosafety levels of protection at the Seattle
facility, said Dr. William Morton, director of the regional primate
research center at the UW.
"We do need to have an elevated level of containment," Morton said.
The lab facilities, which are primarily used today for HIV research
involving primates, are built to Biosafety Level 2.
But Morton said it's not clear that the 1918 flu study will require
all the Biosafety Level 3 Ag protections.
He said the plan is to create an "enhanced" level 3 lab on one floor
of the primate center, located in a non-descript research building in
The difference between a routine Biosafety Level 3 lab and the
Biosafety Level 3 Ag lab is significant. Only the latter has an
air-lock entry, a system for decontaminating wastewater and various
other filters or devices aimed at minimizing the spread of infectious
Morton said the precise design for converting the lab would depend
upon recommendations from the NIH.
Karen Van Dusen, UW director of environmental health and safety, said
Hammond is correct that there are no agreed-upon laboratory standards
for dealing with the 1918 flu virus.
"Our situation here is very similar to the early days of the AIDS
epidemic, figuring out how to safely deal with HIV," Van Dusen said.
This is because the 1918 virus had disappeared after the outbreak.
Viral DNA was recovered a few years ago from the exhumed bodies of
those killed in the pandemic. Most of the DNA came from those who had died in
northern latitudes where the permanently frozen ground had
preserved viral DNA.
Scientists at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and at Mount
Sinai led some of the expeditions to dig up the 1918 victims and
genetically reconstitute the virus.
"We intend to be very cautious," Van Dusen said. "No matter what
standard comes out, we intend to meet or exceed it" -- unless the
recommendation is Biosafety Level 4. "If they're going to require a
Biosafety Level 4, we won't do this," she said.
Katze has already been working with non-infectious, genetic fragments
of the 1918 flu virus. He and his colleagues have shown that the
macaque monkeys develop infections similar to that of humans and
should provide excellent animal models for trying to decipher this
killer bug's mode of operation.
Katze's team will seek to learn more about the nature of the 1918 flu
by inserting key genes from the killer flu into a common flu strain.
The flu virus has only eight genes, said Katze, so they hope to
rapidly target which genes are most responsible for virulence. The
monkeys will be euthanized weeks after being infected, the UW
scientists said, to allow for tissue, cellular and genetic testing.
Scientists testing a resurrected version of the 1918 flu virus on
lab mice believe the 20th-centuries deadliest pathogen reaped its
toll through a combination of runaway tissue inflammation and cell
The so-called Spanish flu that swept parts of the world at the end
of the First World War claimed, by some estimates, as many as 40
million or 50 million lives - nearly three times more than the
1914-18 conflict itself.
The H1N1 virus could take someone in robust good health and put him
in his grave in just three or four days, wrecking lung tissue with
such efficiency that the patient would sometimes drown in his own
In an experiment never seen before in medicine, U.S. researchers
went to Alaska to recover tissue samples from a woman victim of
Spanish flu whose body had been preserved in permafrost.
Teasing out fragments of the virus, they painstakingly recreated the
H1N1's eight genes. They brought back to life a killer last seen
more than three generations ago.
In a paper published online last week by the British journal Nature,
the investigators report that they exposed this replica virus to
mice, and compared those results with data using three other flu
One of the three was a conventional flu strain: another was a
conventional strain with two of the 1918 genes; and the third
comprised a strain with five 1918 genes.
Mice who had been infected with the full eight-gene 1918 recombinant
virus rode the fast track to sickness and death.
They outstripped the three other strains for the speed at which they
fell sick, the high concentrations of virus in their blood and for
their high mortality rate within five days.
Within 24 hours of infection, four key foot-soldiers in the immune
system went haywire, unleashing huge inflammation of the lungs,
while genes that order cells to commit suicide, a process called
apoptosis, were activated.
Post-mortem analysis, carried out at various points during the
experiment, showed the mice's lungs were ravaged by a 'massive"
buildup of fluid caused by hemorrhaging and bronchitis, while the
lungs' lining, the epithelium, was swiftly destroyed.
They caution, though, that further work, on pigs, ferrets and
monkeys, is needed to rule out a remote possibility that
inflammation and cell-death were the consequence, rather than the
cause, of the virus' brutality.
The U.S. team is led by John Kash of the University of Washington
school of medicine, Seattle.
The new work is the latest and most ambitious chapter in the saga of
the recreated 1918 virus; previous research has shown it descended
entirely from a strain of avian flu, something that is at the heart
of today's fears surrounding H5N1 bird flu.
The groundbreaking tale has also been punctuated by concern voiced
by others that the pathogen could escape from the lab.
Kash and his colleagues stress that the animals were all kept within
a Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) laboratory where all personnel wore
protective hoods and backpack air supplies.
BSL4, the highest security rating, is reserved for pathogens for
which there are no drugs or vaccines.
The 1918 flu mutated into other strains for which many people today
may have some immunity; there are also vaccines and antiviral drugs
that are believed likely to be effective against the original
Kash also strongly defends the usefulness of the research, saying
that finding out the pathways by which H1N1 was able to kill so
quickly could help the fight against H5N1 bird flu.
There have been 249 detected cases of humans infected with H5Nl, 146
of them fatal, according to the latest toll, dated Monday, posted on
the World Health Organization website.
Almost all of these cases have come from direct contact with
infected poultry. The worry is that H5N1 could mutate into a form
that is transmitted more easily between humans, unleashing an
entirely new form of flu pathogen against which no-one today, as in
1918, would have immunity.
OFFICIAL: H1N1 CREATED IN THE USA BY SCIENTISTS Journalist: Genetic material for H1N1 obtained from "spanish flu" (see below video)
What may turn out to be one of the biggest flu HOAXES ever perpetrated is going on right now. Naturally, this scare is also being used to promote a world government - just like most of the other hoaxes and crises they create. The sheep are being herded into their pens. (Please also see Ready for Police State page)
Plague-Infested Mice Missing From New Jersey Research Lab - February 7, 2009 David Goodhue - AHN Reporter, Miami, FL (AHN) - The frozen remains of two mice infected with the bubonic plague are missing from a New Jersey bioterror research facility, and the facility waited seven weeks to report the incident to federal and state authorities.
FLASHBACK: We tried to warn people two years ago.... see below.
Critics objected three years ago to Kawaoka's research at UW-Madison involving the deadly 1918 flu virus, saying his safety measures were not strict enough.
This September, they revealed that the university halted his work on components of the Ebola virus last year after the National Institutes of Health said the studies must be done in a lab more secure than any on campus.
Without proper precautions, the critics say, such viruses can escape.
"It's a very significant and a very real risk," said Edward Hammond, of the Austin, Texas-based Sunshine Project, which released documents about the Ebola work. "They handle viruses that could kill tens of millions of people."
In case you didn't know it, the White House since 9/11 has called for spending $44-billion on biological warfare research, a sum unprecedented in world history, and an obliging Congress has authorized it. [Click here for more on Bio Research]
Very Mad Cows!
Just weeks after President Bush promised to re-open
the border to Canadian Beef, we get a "suspect animal" that the media was
quick to label as infected with BSE, even though no conclusive tests existed!
PROGRAM DETECTS SUSPECT ANIMAL
OTTAWA, December 30, 2004 - Preliminary
results completed late on December 29, 2004 have identified a suspect
10-year-old dairy cow. Although the finding is not definitive, multiple
screening tests have yielded positive results.
No part of the animal entered the human food or animal feed systems.
Samples are currently being analyzed at the Canadian Science Centre for Human
and Animal Health in Winnipeg. Confirmatory results are expected in three to
The Government of Canada’s normal policy is to report only confirmed
results. However, given the unique situation created by the United States’
border announcement on December 29 it was decided that the most prudent action
would be to publicly announce the available information and provide
stakeholders with a full understanding of the current situation.
Since confirming BSE
in Canada in 2003, CFIA
officials have stated that finding more cases in North America was possible.
Canada’s public health measures have been built on this assumption. As a
result, the confirmation of a new case of BSE would not indicate increased
risk to food safety as Canada requires the removal of specified risk material
(SRM) from all animals
entering the human food supply. SRM
are tissues that, in infected cattle, contain the
BSE agent. This
measure is internationally recognized as the most effective means of
protecting public health from
The suspect animal was detected through the national surveillance program,
implemented in co-operation with the provinces and the animal health
community. Testing was conducted after the animal was identified as a downer,
one of the high-risk categories targeted by the surveillance program. To date,
more than 21,000 animals have been tested this year.
Similar to the two North American
animals detected in 2003, this animal was born before the Canadian and
American feed bans were introduced in 1997. If
BSE is confirmed
in this case, consumption of contaminated feed before 1997 remains the most
likely route of transmission. Evidence collected through investigations and
risk analyses continues to indicate that the feed ban has successfully limited
BSE spread since
U.S. officials have been informed
of the suspect case of BSE.
This finding should not have a significant or lasting impact on efforts to
normalize trade. In negotiations with trading partners, including the
U.S., Canada has been very open about
the prospect of finding more
[It should be noted that one can not get BSE from
eating beef; rather you have to consume the brains or spinal column of an
The CFIA will
hold a technical briefing on December 30, 2004 at 11:00
EST. A media advisory will be
issued prior to the briefing with additional information. -30-
MONTGOMERY - Republican gubernatorial candidate Roy
Moore said Friday it was a "strange coincidence" that mad cow disease was
found in Alabama just as government officials want to start an
Well if our theory is correct about mad cow being mysteriously linked to the rise of the Canadian Dollar, we should be seeing an outbreak right about now, since in the last month (posted April 2007) the loony has been rising at an unprecedented rate.... So did we find one??? We'll yes we did.... after months and months of no reported cases, look what was reported in the May 2, 2007 Vancouver Sun paper.
A case of mad cow disease has been found in a six-year-old dairy cow in the Fraser Valley, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency announced Wednesday.
“There was a cow that was sick for a short period of time. It wasn’t getting better so it was destroyed late last week,” Dr. George Luterbach, senior vetinarian with CFIA, said.
Officials believe the cow contracted the disease through the feed sometime during its first year.
An investigation is underway to identify and test herdmates around the same age, the CFIA said.
.. and THE DAY after the head of the Bank of Canada jokingly stated to media that the Canadian dollar was "probably over-valued".... we got this nice bit of propaganda on "Mad Cow" from the courts of Quebec..
MONTREAL -- A Quebec Superior Court ruling has given the go-ahead to a multibillion-dollar class-action lawsuit that charges the federal government jeopardized public safety in its handling of the mad cow outbreak.
Update: Russian news agency ITAR-TASS is reporting that the release of the virus came after an "international drill" last month that was held at Pirbright Laboratory, in which live virus was used. Real attacks are always shadowed by drills to provide culpable deniability.
Cats Can Catch and Spread Bird Flu, Study Says - Stefan Lovgren, National Geographic News, Sept 2, 2004
A bird flu virus killed 26 people in Asia and led to the
vast slaughter of poultry several months ago. Now a new study says the flu can
also infect cats, and that cats can spread the flu to other cats. The finding
raises the possibility that they may eventually spread the flu to other
mammals, including humans.
The lethal avian flu that is spreading rapidly around
the world could soon infect wild birds and domesticated flocks in the United
States, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt said on
In testimony to a congressional panel on his agency's
budget for combating a possible avian flu outbreak among humans, Leavitt told
senators that no one knows when or if the virus will pose a threat to people.
But, he said, "it's just a matter of time -- it may be very soon" when wild
birds and possibly poultry flocks contract the disease.
Leavitt said that infection of birds alone in the
United States with the H5N1 virus would not create a public health emergency.
Such an emergency would occur if the disease mutated so that it became easily
transferred from human to human.
The H5N1 disease so far has killed [a mere] 94 people in seven
Nevertheless, Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee
criticized the Bush administration's preparedness, saying not enough federal
funds were being allocated for vaccine production, stockpiling other medical
supplies, disease detection and community readiness.
"It could be the disaster of our time. Two billion
dollars is not enough," North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad (news, bio, voting
record), the senior Democrat on the committee, told Leavitt.
Conrad was referring the $2.3 billion in additional
emergency funds the Bush administration has requested from Congress. Late last
year, Congress approved a first injection of more than $3 billion in emergency
While U.S. poultry flocks have suffered from isolated
cases of highly contagious avian flu, they have not yet been hit by the
virulent H5N1 strain that has killed or led to the culling of about 200
million birds, mostly in Asia, since late 2003.
Recently, the animal disease has been found in western
Europe and worries escalated this week when German authorities said avian flu
may have jumped species and killed a cat.
CONTACT WITH SICK BIRDS
So far, human fatalities have largely been limited to
people who have had close contact with sick birds.
Leavitt told the committee that by the end of this
year, the United States will have about 20 million doses of anti-viral drugs,
mostly Tamiflu, stockpiled.
But the development of a vaccine is three to five years
away, Leavitt said. He downplayed chances that this timetable could be
accelerated significantly and added that even with vaccine technology, it
would take drug companies six months after the start of a pandemic to produce
an effective one.
"In the first six months of a pandemic we are dependent
on basic public health, social distancing; every business, every school, every
church, every county to have a plan," Leavitt said, adding, "We are overdue
(for a pandemic) and under-protected, but we are moving with dispatch."
Leavitt also was skeptical that the federal government
could provide all localities with the full arsenal of basic medical equipment,
such as ventilators, masks, gauze and gloves, needed during a pandemic. That
surprised Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire
Republican, who said he had thought the billions of dollars being spent would
cover such stockpiles.
Instead, Leavitt put the responsibility of local preparedness mostly with local officials.
Just get a hold of the amazing hype concerning bird flu! It has killed 103 people globally....
ATLANTA (Reuters) - A leading U.S. health agency staged a war game this week to test its
response to one of the worst health emergencies it could imagine -- an outbreak of avian
flu on American soil.
So why are they doing this? To get you to take their killer vaccines, and grant them more police state power under the guise of "emergency".... It's the oldest trick in the book.
[See Also: Bio Research Are they making a super virus as part of a depopulation plan?]
Are you ready for forced vaccinations??? This may just be a beta test or partial 'drill'... but legislation is now being written in several US states, and European countries, to FORCE YOU and your family to either take their poisonous vaccine, or go to a concentration camp (they may have a different name for it). Not much of a choice, is it??
Legislation will strip Americans of the right to sue drug companies if harmed by an experimental vaccine
Forced Vaccination: A Simple Question - Aug/09 Blogcritics Politics The Obama administration may be considering forced vaccination of children and adults in response to the possibility of a swine flu epidemic this fall.
Among other things, you'll wonder why the American Academy of Pediatrics still fights state legislatures about the use of thimerosal (mercury) in vaccines behind the scenes after publicly asking for its removal eight years ago, after watching Brownyn Hancock's disturbing documentary Vaccination: The Hidden Truth.
Hancock's 90-minute film delves into the truth behind the real dangers of vaccines, often using the very same peer-reviewed research emanating from conventional medicine, and just as my friend and colleague, Dr. Russell Blaylock, has done on my Web site.
Study Shows Decline
in Neurodevelopmental Disorders After Removal of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines
A new study published today (3/1/06) shows that
the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDs) in children has decreased
following removal of thimerosal, a preservative containing the neurotoxin
mercury, from American childhood vaccines. The study, published in the
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, a peer reviewed journal, by Dr.
Mark Geier and David Geier examined two independent databases maintained by
the government – one national and one state. The Vaccine Adverse Events
Reporting System (VAERS) database maintained by the Centers for Disease
Control and the Californian Department of Developmental Services (CDDS)
database each showed the same downward trend for the period from 2002 through
2005. According to the study “[t]he results indicate that the trends in newly
diagnosed NDs correspond directly with the expansion and subsequent
contraction of the cumulative mercury dose to which children were exposed from
[thimerosal-containing vaccines] through the U.S. immunization schedule.”
The study examined the trend for cases of autism
during the period beginning 1994 and ending 2002 compared with the period from
2002 to June, 2005. The trends for increases and decreases of cases of autism
found in the VAERS national database were consistent with the trends found in
the CDDC California database. Most significantly, in each database the
increasing and decreasing trends correlate with the time that the exposure to
thimerosal through the immunization schedule was increased and then decreased
after removal of mercury containing vaccines. “The consistency of the effects
observed for the spectrum of NDs, including autism and speech disorders, and
the agreement between the observations from two separate databases, support
the conclusion that the effect is real and not a chance observation.” The
study found that the magnitude of the change in the decreasing trend of cases
was significant after removal of mercury from vaccines. Data from the U.S.
Department of Education, a third database, showed a recent decrease of autism
diagnoses that is consistent with the findings in the two databases.
The authors show that the biological plausibility
of their statistical findings is supported by recent toxicological and
molecular studies that reveal the mechanism by which mercury from vaccines can
cause damage to the developing brains of children. A recent study by
researchers at the University of Washington has shown that ethylmercury from
thimerosal in vaccines can cross from the bloodstream into the brain in toxic
amounts which can remain in brain tissue for many years. This finding
contradicted the untested view about the toxicity of ethylmercury in vaccines
that prevailed in public health for 75 years. Other researchers have shown
that minute concentrations of mercury, far lower than previously believed and
far less than other toxins such as lead, can destroy neurons and damage DNA
within hours of exposure. Such low levels of mercury, which likely are reached
in infant brains via vaccine thimerosal exposure, can disrupt cell signaling
and metabolic pathways necessary for normal brain development. Studies in
mice, rabbits, monkeys, rats and other animals support these findings. Further
studies in children have found evidence of mercury toxicity, metabolic
disruption and oxidative stress that is consistent with the author’s
statistical findings that thimerosal in vaccines causes autism and
The authors point out that their finding that the
VAERS and CDDS databases show strong associations between thimerosal
containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders completely contradicts
the 2004 findings contained in a report published by the Institute of Medicine
of the National Academy of Sciences – which was based on data controlled
exclusively by the Center for Disease Control’s National Immunization Program
and unavailable to outside researchers. In arguing that their study’s findings
justify additional research the authors point out that the handling of vaccine
safety data by the Centers for Disease Control has been called into serious
question in a 2005 report published by the Institute of Medicine.
You can view and download a pdf file containing
the new study, “Early Downward Trends in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Following Removal of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines” by clicking here. It is
being published today in Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2006 of the peer-reviewed
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
ATLANTA - The parents of a girl who won a government settlement described how their hearts were broken as they watched their healthy, red-haired toddler transformed into an irritable, odd-behaving child after she got several childhood shots.
"Suddenly my daughter was no longer there," said Terry Poling, the girl's mother, in a news conference Thursday. She and her husband Jon said their daughter Hannah, now 9, has been diagnosed with autism.
The government has agreed to pay the Polings from a (five Billion dollar) federal fund that compensates people injured by vaccines. The amount of the settlement hasn't been set yet.
I have a son that was mercury poisoned by (Thimerasol) in the vaccines he was given in 1997, 187.5mcg/12 months. Thank God I didn’t take him back for his booster shots. I had a normal, happy baby that crashed & burned. Not overnight, it was a slow, gradual loss of language, then eye contact, sleep, ect….Autism. Bull s**t, it’s ethyl mercury & I have the lab work to prove it.
Bill Frist gave big Pharma immunity from all liability. Firestone would have loved this deal, make an inferior product, cover it up for decades, get off scott free. My family represents 1:166 nationwide that is dealing with therapy bills that insurance won’t cover.
What does mercury do to the brain? Watch below video.
Tom Jefferson says that
because the virus changes from year to year, it is difficult to assess
the vaccine's effectiveness.
Jefferson, co-ordinator of
the vaccine group at the Cochrane Collaboration in Rome, which reviews
health treatments, said most of the research that has looked into the
impact of flu vaccines is of poor quality.
But the move was too little too late, said a group whose members say they are victims of Tamiflu side effects, which came to light in Japan in 2005 after 12 children died and 32 experienced abnormal behavior after taking the drug.
CHICAGO - Soaring numbers of American children are
being prescribed anti-psychotic drugs — in many cases, for attention deficit
disorder or other behavioral problems for which these medications have
not been proven to work, a study found.
The annual number of children prescribed anti-psychotic drugs jumped
fivefold between 1995 and 2002, to an estimated 2.5 million, the study
said. That is an increase from 8.6 out of every 1,000 children in the
mid-1990s to nearly 40 out of 1,000.
But more than half of the prescriptions were for
attention deficit and other non-psychotic conditions, the researchers said.
The findings are worrisome "because it looks
like these medications are being used for large numbers of children in a
setting where we don't know if they work," said lead author Dr. William
Cooper, a paediatrician at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital.
may mean mandatory drugging of your children.
CHILDREN as young
as five have suffered strokes, heart attacks, hallucinations and convulsions
after taking drugs to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Documents obtained by The Australian reveal that almost 400 serious adverse
reactions have been reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, some
involving children as young as three.
Cases include the sudden death of a seven-year-old, and a
five-year-old who suffered a stroke after taking Ritalin. Children also
experienced heart palpitations and shortness of breath after taking
When the Times refers to an experiment as "bold and controversial" the
reporter is sanitizing the fact that the experiment is UNETHICAL—it violates
medicine's cardinal rule "First, do no harm."
The New York Times reports: "In recent years, psychiatric researchers
have been experimenting with a bold and controversial treatment strategy:
they are prescribing drugs to young people at risk for schizophrenia who
have not yet developed the full-blown disorder."
Vaccination is the main cause of autism, and they are not looking
for the truth in that regard, for the truth could destroy the medical
industry with a 'dominoe effect.'
The dangers of all the diseases have been massively hyped to sell
vaccination, and fearmongering has become a science to more effectively
sell vaccines and other drugs. [See: Epidemic Fearmongering.]
Vaccination, from top to bottom (including the government), is run
by the drug industry---the fox is in charge of the henhouse, so only the
vaccine belief system ever gets disseminated, and:
Vaccine testing, for effectiveness and contaminants, is left to the
makers, and they have NEVER (that anyone has yet found)
run a vaccine trial using 100% unvaccinated children as controls--some
sort of red flag--it is left to journalists like Dan Olmsted,
and you can see why. [See: 'Vaccines
are adequately tested' lie.] One of their
main reasons for maintaining high vaccine uptake is to eliminate these
unvaccinated controls. Also:
Vaccine makers are protected from litigation, which eliminates the
main driver for vaccine "safety". Not only that, the victims (taxpayer)
have to pay for the damage.
Vaccination is run on the false Pasteurian germ theory, while the
correct one (Bechamp) would completely undermine the vaccination belief
system. [See: Disease Theory.]
Consequently, along with the present knowledge of the child immune
system (as stated by Dr Dunbar, above), vaccination is an on going,
highly profitable, medical experiment using children, without informed
consent, and to compound that fact--by compulsion in the USA.
Study Shows Decline in Neurodevelopmental Disorders After Removal of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines
A new study published today (3/1/06) shows that the rate of
neurodevelopmental disorders (NDs) in children has decreased following removal of thimerosal, a preservative containing the neurotoxin mercury, from American childhood vaccines. The study, published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, a peer reviewed journal, by Dr. Mark Geier and David Geier examined two independent databases maintained by the government - one national and one state. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and the Californian Department of Developmental Services (CDDS) database each showed the same downward trend for the period from 2002 through 2005. According to the study "[t]he results indicate that the trends in newly diagnosed NDs correspond directly with the expansion and subsequent contraction of the cumulative mercury dose to which children were exposed from [thimerosal-containing vaccines] through the U.S. immunization schedule."
The study examined the trend for cases of autism during the period beginning 1994 and ending 2002 compared with the period from 2002 to June, 2005. The trends for increases and decreases of cases of autism found in the VAERS national database were consistent with the trends found in the CDDC California database. Most significantly, in each database the increasing and decreasing trends correlate with the time that the exposure to thimerosal through the immunization schedule was increased and then decreased after removal of mercury containing vaccines. "The consistency of the effects observed for the spectrum of NDs, including autism and speech disorders, and the agreement between the observations from two separate databases, support the conclusion that the effect is real and not a chance observation." The study found that the magnitude of the change in the decreasing trend of cases was significant after removal of mercury from vaccines. Data from the U.S. Department of Education, a third database, showed a recent decrease of autism diagnoses that is consistent with the findings in the two databases.
The authors show that the biological plausibility of their statistical findings is supported by recent toxicological and molecular studies that reveal the mechanism by which mercury from vaccines can cause damage to the developing brains of children. A recent study by researchers at the University of Washington has shown that ethylmercury from thimerosal in vaccines can cross from the bloodstream into the brain in toxic amounts which can remain in brain tissue for many years. This finding contradicted the untested view about the toxicity of ethylmercury in vaccines that prevailed in public health for 75 years.
Other researchers have shown that minute concentrations of mercury, far lower than previously believed and far less than other toxins such as lead, can destroy neurons and damage DNA within hours of exposure. Such low levels of mercury, which likely are reached in infant brains via vaccine thimerosal exposure, can disrupt cell signaling and metabolic pathways necessary for normal brain development. Studies in mice, rabbits, monkeys, rats and other animals support these findings. Further studies in children have found evidence of mercury toxicity, metabolic disruption and oxidative stress that is consistent with the author's statistical findings that thimerosal in vaccines causes autism and developmental disorders.
The authors point out that their finding that the VAERS and CDDS databases show strong associations between thimerosal containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders completely contradicts the 2004 findings contained in a report published by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences - which was based on data controlled exclusively by the Center for Disease Control's National Immunization Program and unavailable to outside researchers. In arguing that their study's findings justify additional research the authors point out that the handling of vaccine safety data by the Centers for Disease Control has been called into serious question in a 2005 report published by the Institute of Medicine.
You can view and download a pdf file containing the new study, "Early Downward Trends in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Following Removal of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines" by clicking here. It is being published today in Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 2006 of the peer-reviewed Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that
kills almost all cancers by switching off their “immortality”. The drug,
dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare
metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.
Controversial fluoride is one of the basic
ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas
Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of
aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics,
hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, and military nerve gas. It's historically been
quite expensive to properly dispose of, until some aluminum industries with
an overabundance of the stuff sold the public on the terrifically insane but
highly profitable idea of buying it at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into
our water supplies, and then DRINKING it.
Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride-- intended only for human consumption by
people under 14 years of age--is injected into our drinking water supply at
approx. 1 part-per-million (ppm), but since we only drink 1/2 of one percent
of the total water supply, the rest literally goes down the drain as a free hazardous-waste disposal for the chemical industry, where we PAY them so
that we can flush their expensive hazardous waste down our toilets. How many
salesmen dream of such a deal? (Follow the money.)
Independent scientific evidence repeatedly showing up over the past 50 years
reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes cancer and
various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken hips in old
folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one package. There are reports of aluminum in the brain possibly being a causative factor
in Alzheimer's Disease, and evidence points towards fluoride's strong
affinity for aluminum and also its ability to "trick" the blood-brain
barrier by looking like the hydrogen ion, and thus allowing chemical access
to brain tissue.
Scientists who have attempted to blow the whistle on this mega-bucks PR ploy
have consistently been given a very unscientific Black-PR treatment, and
thus their valid points disputing the current vested interests never arrive
in the press.
Follow the money to find the control.
In 1952 the slick PR campaign which ram-rodded the concept of fluoridation
through via our Public Health departments and various dental organizations
was likened to a highly- motional "beer-salesman's convention" instead of
the objective scientific experiment which it should properly have been. It's
continued in that vein right up to present time.
To illustrate the emotional vs. the scientific nature of this issue, just
look at the response given by people (perhaps yourself included?) when the
subject of fluoridation comes up. Ask yourself, "Is this response EMOTIONAL
BLUSTER, or is it UNBIASED AND OPENLY- INTERESTED OBJECTIVITY?"
There is a tremendous amount of emotional, highly unscientific know-it-all
attached to fluoridation. Many truly independent (unattached to any
vested-interest) scientists who've spent a large portion of their lives
studying and working with this subject have been subjected to a surprising
amount of uncalled-for and unfair character assassination from strong
vested-interest groups who profit from the public's ignorance as well as
from their illnesses. (Follow the money.)
Do you have diabetes or kidney disease? There are reportedly more than 11
million Americans with diabetes. Since many diabetics drink more liquids
than other people, then according to the Physicians Desk Reference these 11
million Americans probably shouldn't drink fluoridated water, because in
doing so, they'll receive an excessive dose of fluoride.
Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which
is your main route of fluoride elimination. --So those people with kidney
disease also shouldn't drink fluoridated water. Cases are on record
(Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney patients on dialysis machines died,
due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply.
Let's begin at the beginning: The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking
water on Earth was found in Germany's Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had
little concern about fluoride's supposed effect on children's teeth; their
alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to
sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm
submission. (Ref. book: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional
Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins,
a chemist: "I have your letter of September 29 asking for further
documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water
Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought
to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. "In the 1930's,
Hitler and the German Nazi's envisioned a world to be dominated and
controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked
out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass- control which was
submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to
control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking
water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole
areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in
women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a
prominent place. ...
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an
individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing
a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those
who wish to govern him." [A convenient light lobotomy]
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's
teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be
done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose
behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to
domination and control and loss of liberty.
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German
General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and
military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through
water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted
ideally into their plan to communize the world. ...
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of
the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi
movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a
scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry,
biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks
artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never
again be the same person mentally or physically." - CHARLES E. PERKINS,
Chemist, 2 October 1954.
Quoting Einstein's nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a
prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror,
Springfield, MA, January 1952. Excerpts follow: "It appears that the
citizens of Massachusetts are among the 'next' on the agenda of the water
"There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless 'intellectual'
parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more
extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true
objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic(s)--from within if they can, according to their plan--for their own possession.
tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the
moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds
towards their own ultimate victory over us.
"Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most
subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration....
"As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22
years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on
my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let
me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national
suicide. Don't do it.
"Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no
effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the
most efficient rat-killer. ... Sodium fluoride is entirely different from
organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by
nature, in God's great providence and love, to build and strengthen our
bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from
proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable
by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in
fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble.
The body refuses to assimilate it.
"Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic
research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that
instead of preserving or promoting 'dental health,' fluoridated drinking
water destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive
mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and
also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal
organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a "health" plan? What's behind it?
"That any so-called "doctors" would persuade a civilized nation to add
voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable.
It is the height of criminal insanity. "No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully
believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin's Last
Will and Hitler's Mein Kampf: "America we shall demoralize, divide, and
destroy from within." ...
"Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of
water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other
countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most
effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no
antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats. ...
"Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick
national liquidation. It is criminal insanity--treason!" Dr. E.H. Bronner,
Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles. ---------
available Russian fluoride evidence: "I, Oliver Kenneth Goff, was a member
of the Communist Party and the Young Communist League, from May 2, 1936, to
October 9, 1939. During this period of time, I operated under the alias of
John Keats with number 18-B-2. My testimony before the Government is in
Volume 9 of the Un-American Activities Report for 1939.
"While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training
schools in New York and Wisconsin ... and we were trained in the
revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government. "... We discussed quite
thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in
Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt
that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring
about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the general
public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism.
We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the
water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as
it would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and
either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they
would surrender to obtain fresh water.
It is more poisonous than lead and just
slightly less poisonous than arsenic. It has been used as a pesticide for
the control of mice, rats, and other small pests. A spokesman from Procter
and Gamble, the makers of Crest, acknowledges that a family-sized tube of
fluoride toothpaste "theoretically, at least, contains enough fluoride to
kill a small child." While no one is going to die from drinking one glass
of fluoridated water, just as no one will die from smoking one cigarette,
it is the longer-term chronic effects of glass after glass of
fluoridated water that takes its toll in human health - and life.
Have these harmful effects been proven?
Yes. In a court case in Pennsylvania lasting 20
days, it was proven that fluoridation is harmful. The presiding judge, John Pl. Flaherty, said he was "compellingly convinced" of the harmful
effects of fluoridation. In an Illinois court case lasting 40 days,
Judge Ronald A. Niemann ruled that fluoridation "created a risk... of
serious health hazards". Allergic-type reactions have been reported by top
physicians, including Nobel Prize winner Dr. William Murphy. With regard
to the amount of fluoride found in a quart of fluoridated water, the
Physlcians' Desk Reference points out: "Dental fluorosis (mottling) may
result... In hypersensitive individuals, fluorides occasionally cause skin
eruptions such as atopic dermatites, eczema, or urticaria. Gastric
distress, headache, and weakness have also been reported. These
hypersensitive reactions usually disappear promptly after discontinuation
of the fluoride."
A Chronology of Fluoridation By Val Valerian - Leading Edge Research Group
Fluoride Facts [Reference link at end
found to be an equivocal carcinogen by the National Cancer Institute
Further studies by the New Jersey
Department of Health have now confirmed a 6.9 fold increase in bone cancer
in young males.2
Earlier studies had found a 5% increase in
all types of cancers in fluoridated communities.3
Drinking fluoridated water will double the
number of hip fractures for both older men and women.45
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
scientists reported a close correlation between decreasing total fertility
rates in women between ages of 10 and 49, and increasing fluoride levels.
No correlation was found between the level
of fluoride in water and dental caries.7 8 9 10 11
The International Academy of Oral Medicine
and Toxicology has classified Fluoride as an unapproved dental medicament
due to its high toxicity.
1855 Smelters in Freiburg, Germany first paid damages to neighbors injured
by fluoride emissions. (See 1893)
1893 The smelters in Freiburg, Germany paid out 80,000 marks in damages for
fluorine contamination injuries and 644,000 marks for permanent relief. (See
1855, 1900, 1907).
1900 The existence of the smelting industry in Germany and Great Britain is
threatened by successful lawsuits for fluorine damage and by budensome laws
1907 The smelters in Freiburg, Germany (see 1893) are identified as the
cause of cripplied cattle in the area since 1877, and fluorides are
identified as the culprit.
1916 The first evidence of brown mottling of teeth is reported in the United
States, and would be eventually found to be caused by fluorides in water.
1922 Aluminum production (along with production of toxic by-product sodium
fluoride) increases. Aluminum cookware is mass introduced in the US,
beginning the gradual accumulation of aluminum in the brains of Americans.
Additional aluminum is injected into society in "antacids" and toothpaste
tubes, which aggrevate the action of toxic fluorides.
1928 The equivalent of the U.S. Public Health Service is under the
jurisdiction of Treasury Secretary Andrew W. Mellon, a founder and major
stockholder of ALCOA aluminum, a major producer of toxic fluoride wastes.
Mellon would step down from control of the Public Health in 1931.
1928 Edward L.Bernays, nephew to Sigmund Freud, writes the book Propaganda,
in which he explains the structure of the mechanism which controls the
public mind, and how it is manipulated by those who wish to create public
acceptance for a particular idea or commodity. Says Bernays, "those who
manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible
government which is the true ruling power of our country. Our minds are
molded, our tastes are formed, largely by men we have never heard of."
Bernays represents another connection to Germany and would be essential in
the fluoride campaign in the United States. Wrote Bernay's, "if you can
influence group leaders, either with or without their conscious cooperation,
you automatically influence the group which they sway." (See Bernay's, 1947,
and the fluoride campaign).
1930 Kettering Laboratory is founded from gifts from Ethyl Corporation,
General Electric and DuPont (all who have interlocking relationships with
I.G. Farben in Germany) to "investigate chemical hazards in American
industrial operations" under contract, with provision that research "shall
not be released to the public without the consent of the contracting
company." During the mid-20th century, Kettering dominated the medical
literature on the toxicology of fluorides, but information was not released
into the public domain.
1931 A considerable portion of Kettering Laboratory's facilities are
dedicated to the study of fluorides. Under contract, the studies are not
releasable to the public. (See also 1939, Mellon Institute)
1931 Three independent groups of scientists determine that fluoride in the
water is the cause of dental mottling. Research teams from ALCOA Aluminum
(who have fluorides as a hazardous by-product of aluminum manufacture) and
the University of Arizona. Also shown by North African investigators and
others. Dr. Gerald Cox of the Mellon Institute, owners of ALCOA, would later
solve the expensive disposal problem with toxic fluorides by convincing
others that it could be dumped in the public water supply as a
"preventative" for tooth decay.
1931 Under an agreement with I.G. Farben, ALCOA accepts a restriction on the
production of magnesium in the U.S, hampering the war effort, while Germany
itself stepped up production. Most of the U.S. production was shipped out of
the country to Germany.
1931 Public Health Service dentist H. Trendley Dean is dispatched by ALCOA
founder Andrew Mellon to certain remote towns in the Western U.S. where
water wells have a naturally high concentration of calcium fluorides. Dean's
mission would be to find out how much fluoride people could physically
tolerate before obvious visible damage to their teeth. Dean publishes a
purposely skewed and deceptive study which purports to show that at 1ppm,
flourides result in the "reduction of tooth decay". (See Gerald Cox, 1939)
1931 The Mellon Institute is ALCOA's Pittsburgh research lab.
1931 From 1931 to 1939, the U.S. Public Health Service seeks to remove
fluorides from water supplies because of endemic mottled teeth. ALCOA's
fluoride proposals have not been bought into by the public or government
1931 I.G. Farben and Alcoa Aluminum sign Alted Agreement pooling patents,
which would continue through 1939 and beyond. I.G. Farben complex begins
large contributions to fund Nazi cause.
1933 A study is published in which it is shown that fluorides inhibit the
action relative to lipase on ethyl acetate in vivo 50 percent at a
concentration of one part in 15 million. (McClure, F.J., "A Review of
Fluorine and its physiological effects", Physiological Review, 13: 295-297,
1933 According to a study by Freni in 1994 (71), in 1933 and again in 1984
that fluorides produce cumulative generational effects on biological
1937 U.S. Public Health Service publishes material indicating that fluoride
concentrations in many U.S. cities varied between 0.6 ppm to 8.0 ppm. A
concentration of 0.9 ppm means that over 10% of children have mottled teeth
and tooth deformities.
1937 A clinical hygienic study by K. Roholm in 1937, Fluoride Intoxication,
published by H.K. Lewis, London. Roholm is convinced that fluorides cross
the placental barrier into the fetus. (70). This realization is echoed in
1951 by an M.D. and chemist from the University of Oregon Medical School.
1938 Dr. Wallace Armstrong and P.J.Brekhus at the University of Minnesota
Department of Biochemistry publish a study in which they claim that the
enamel of sound teeth had a significantly greater fluoride content than the
enamel of teeth with cavities. Armstrong was to admit that these results
were false. In a followup study in 1963, Dr. Armstrong found no difference
in the fluoride contents of the enamal of sound or decayed teeth.
1938 The University of Mexico Bulletin, August 1, 1938, in an article
entitled "Menace of Fluorine to Health", states "Solutions of sodium
fluoride with a fluoride content as low as one part in 15 million may
inhibit the action of the lipase (pancreatic juice) as much as 50 percent."
1939 The ALCOA company, the world's largest producer of sodium
fluoride,transfers it technology under the Alted Agreement to Germany. Dow
Chemical follows suit.
1939 ALCOA-sponsored bochemist Gerald J. Cox fluoridates rats in his lab and
mysteriously concludes that "fluoride reduces cavities". He makes a public
proposal that the U.S. should fluoridate its water supplies. Cox begins to
tour the United States, stumping for fluoridation.
1939 Scientists at I.G. Farben prepare the first sample of fluorinated nerve
1939 On September 29, 1939, Mellon Institute scientist Gerald J. Cox plays a
major role in the promotion of fluoridation by saying "the present trend
toward removal of fluorides from food and water may need reversal. Water
engineers had been recommending a maximum allowable fluoride contaminant
level of 0.1 part per million (ppm), maintaining a tenfold margin of safety.
(When fluorides were eventually added to water through corporate pressure,
that safety factor would be thrown out and the level raised tenfold beyond
the engineering recommendations in 1939, when fluoride was properly
recognized as a toxic contaminant. Note: Mellon Institute was founded by
Andrew and Richard Mellon, former owners of ALCOA Aluminum, plagued by
disposal problems of toxic fluoride by products. ALCOA also had a
relationship with I.G. Farben in Germany)
1939 U.S. Public Health Service regulations state "the presence of fluorides
in excess of 1 ppm shall constitute rejection of the water supply." (Yet,
when water fluoridation is instituted, levels are set at a minumum of 1 ppm)
1939 Volume 9 Report to the House Un-American Activities Committee delves
deeply into the alleged use of fluoridation to keep the American people
docile, so they would accept the changing of their system of government to a
1940 Soviet concentration camps maintained by fluoride administration to
inmates to decrease resistance to authority and induce physical
1942 "Fluorine may cause anoxia in the newborn and shorten the period of
their survival" Ref: Himwich, H.E., et al., American Journal of Physiology,
1942 Germany becomes worlds largest producer of aluminum (and Sodium
Fluoride). Fluoride is used in the concentration camps to render the
prisoners docile and inhibit the questioning of authority.
1943 Researchers from the US Public Health Service examine the health of
residents of Bartlett, Texas to see if the 8ppm fluoride in the drinking
water was affecting their health. It was checked again in 1953. They find
that the death rate in Bartlett was three times higher than a neighboring
town which contained 0.4 ppm fluoride.
1943 A special New York State Health Department Committee is appointed to
study the advisability of adding fluoride to Newburg's drinking water,
chaired by Dr. Hodge, then chief of fluoride toxicity studies for the
1943 The Journal of the American Medical Association on September 18, 1943,
contains an article, "Chronic Fluorine Intoxication", which states,
"fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, changing the permeability of
the cell membrane by inhibiting certain enzymes. The exact mechanism of such
actions, it was said, are obscure. The sources of fluorine intoxication are
drinking water containing 1ppm or more of fluorine, fluorine compounds used
as insecticidal sprays for fruits and vegatables (cryolite and barium fluoro-
silicate) and the mining and conversion of phosphate rock to superphosphate,
which is used as a fertilizer. That process alone releases approximately
25,000 tons of pure fluorine into the atmosphere annually. Other sources of
fluorine intoxication is from the fluorides used in the smelting of many
metals, such as steel and aluminum, and in the production of glass, enamel
1943 Environmental pollution by toxic metals, including fluorides, affects
forests, livestock, and urban residents, but coverage remains on local
1944 "Even at 1ppm, fluoride in drinking water poisons cattle, horses and
sheep" (Moules, G.R., Water Pollution Research and Summary of Current
1944 The city manger of Grand Rapids, Michigan announces that the Michigan
State Department of Health is planning a long range experiment with
fluoridated water and that Grand Rapids was selected as the location for the
experiment. The city commission approves a motion to fluoridate on July 31,
and decides it is to begin in January 1945, despite the warning issued three
months earlier, ironically, by the American Dental Association. Grand Rapids
becomes the first city in the United States to conduct this experiment. It
was to serve as the test city to be compared against un-fluoridated Muskegon
for a period of ten years relative to tooth decay, "at which time it would
be determined whether or not fluoride was "safe and effectiv." Dr. H.
Trendley Dean was put in charge of the project. The experiment was
terminated early, after the control city was fluoridated, ruining the
validity of the experiment, with the pronouncement that fluorides in public
water supplies was "safe".See 1945.
1944 The Pentagon Scientific Research and Development Group further pursued
the project to fluoridate the drinking water of Newburg, New York. Members
included Henry L. Barnett, a captain in the Manhattan Project medical
section, John W. Fertig, SRDG, Dr. Hodge, and David Ast, chief dental
officer of the New York State Health Department, who was placed in charge of
the Newburg Project. The group sought information on cumulative effects,
which was also a goal of the Manhattan Project. (See below)
1944 Through 1948. Previously classified documents from Manhattan Project
which indicate the government knew the physiological and psycho-behavioral
effects of fluorides, as a result of studies connected with determining the
effect of uranium hexafluoride processing on workers, as well as studies in
defense of litigation against the project by tree growers who experienced
fluoride damage from airborne pollutants connected with the project. Ref:
Declassified documents from the National Archives published in 1997.
1944 An April 29, 1944 Manhattan Project memo, released in 1997, states
"Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather
marked central nervous system effect, with mental confusion, drowsiness and
lassitude as the conspicuous features... it seems that the fluoride
component is the causative factor....since work with these compounds is
essential, it will be necessary to know in advance what mental effects may
occur after exposure, if workmen are to be properly protected. This is
important not only to protect a given individual, but also to prevent a
confused workman from injuring others by improperly performing his duties".
Ref: Previously classified SECRET Manhattan Project Memo, 29 April 1944,
declassified and released from the National Archives.
1944 Oscar Ewing is put on the payroll of the Aluminum Company of America
ALCOA), as an attorney, at an annual salary of $750,000. In 1947, Ewing was
made Federal Security Agency Administrator, with the announcement that he
was taking a big cut in salary. The US Public Health Service, then a
division of the FSA, comes under the command of Ewing, and he begins to
vigorously promote fluoridation nationwide. Ref: May 25-27 Hearings before
the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. A by-product of aluminum
manufacture is toxic sodium fluoride. Ewings public relations strategist for
the fluoride campaign was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward L. Bernays.
Bernays conducts a public relations campaign to promote fluorine ingestion
by applying Freudian theory to induce public acceptance. It was one of
Bernays most successful campaigns.
1944 The October 1944 issue of the Journal of the American Dental
Association cautions that "knowledge of the subject does not warrant the
introduction of fluorine in community water supplies generally. Sodium
fluoride is a highly toxic substance, and while its applications in safe
concentrations, and under strict control by competent personnel, may prove
to be useful therepeutically, under other circumstances it may definitely be
harmful. To be effective, fluorine must be ingested into the system during
the years of tooth development, and we do not yet know enough about the
chemistry involved to anticipate what other conditions may be produced in
the structure of the bone and other tissues of the body generally. We do
know that the use of drinking water containing as little as 1.2 to 3.0 ppm
of fluorine will cause such developmental disturbances in bones as
osteosclerosis, spondylosis, and osteopetrosis, as well as goiter, and we
cannot run the risk of producing such serious systemic disturbances in
applying what is at present a doubtful procedure intended to prevent
development of dental disfigurements among children ... because of our
anxiety to find some therapeutic procedure that will promote mass prevention
of caries, the seeming potentialities of fluorine appear speculatively
attractive, but, in the light of our present knowledge or lack of knowledge
of the chemistry of the subject, the potentialities for harm far outweigh
those for good."
1945 An FDA Chief inspector discovers that fluorides are being added to beer
by the Commonwealth Brewing Company of Massachusetts (the same state where
they did experimental fluoride treatments on institutionalized children).
The owner of the brewery was arrested and subjected to a Federal jury trial
for poisoning the beer. The indictment charged that the beer contained "an
added poison or deleterious poison, fluoride, which was unsafe within the
meaning of the statute (Section 301a of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act),
since it was a substance not required in the production of the beer, it
could have been avoided by good manufacturing practice." The fact was
established that the fluoride was added in the concentration of 0.5 ppm. The
jury was instructed that fluoride was established to be harmful and
poisonous, and that it was unimportant to show how much beer it would take
to demonstrate harmful effects. Beer was classified as a food and fluoride
as a poison in 1945. The Commonwealth Brewery Company was slapped with a
$10,000 fine, and Kaufmann, the owner, was given a 6 month suspended jail
sentence and a three year probation period.
1945 Newburgh, New York has their water supply fluoridated in May 1945.
Subsequent exams of the children by x-ray reveal that almost 14% have
cortical defects in bone, compared to the nearby unfluoridated town of
Kingston, where 7.5% have bone defects. The data is suppressed. In tandum,
Project F (connected with the Manhattan Project) conducted their own studies
of Newburg residents, focusing on the amounts of fluoride Newburg residents
retained in the tissues and blood - key information sought by the bomb
program, according to previously classified documents released in 1997. See
1945 The newspaper Philadelphia Record, 18 October 1945, reveals an article
entitled "First Bomb Suit for Ruined Peaches filed by Salem County Growers
for $400,000" details suits against chemical manufacturers connected with
the Manhattan Atomic Bomb Project for hydrogen fluoride damage to peach
groves. Companies involved were DuPont de Nemours (which has been
interacting with I.G. Farben in Nazi Germany), the Sun Oil Company and the
General Chemical Company.
1945 The government does a public test case of fluoridation, comparing
fluoridated Grand Rapids with unfluoridated Muskegon, Michigan. The study is
to last ten years. After one year, it becomes obvious to the government that
fluorides do not conform to their public propaganda, and the study is
terminated. The city of Muskegon is then fluoridated in 1947 to conceal the
difference in effect. Other experiments are performed covertly on population
areas, without the knowledge of the subjects.
1945 Covert experiments with fluorides are conducted in Massachusetts and in
Connecticut between 1945 and 1946 on indigent, mentally retarded children at
state-run schools. According to 1954 testimony of Florence Birmingham, a
trustee of the Wrentham State School in Massachusetts, her schools
administration learned only by accident that fluorides were being put in the
1945 A study reveals that fluoride's affinity for magnesium and manganese
ions enables it to deplete their availability for vital enzyme functions. (Borei,
H., "Inhibition of Cellular Oxidation by Fluoride", Arkiv.Kemi,Mineral,Geol.,
20A, No. 8, 1945).
1946 A letter from the U.S. Engineer Office, Manhattan District, Oak Ridge,
Tennessee, to Colonel Warren, Manhattan Project, 1 May 1946, regarding a
trip to the DuPont plant, discusses the fluoride damage to the environment.
The letter also states "Would there be any use in making attempts to
counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part of residents of Salem and
Gloucester counties through lectures on fluoride toxicology and perhaps the
usefulness of fluoride in tooth health?" Letter signed by Harold C. Hodge,
who was also involved in the Newburgh, New York experiments. Ref: Previously
classified SECRET Manhattan Project Letter, 1 May 1946, declassified and
released from the National Archives in 1997.
1946 An issue of Medical Biochemistry contains a research study by Everetts
which indicates that blood clotting may be affected by fluorides.
1946 Reports from the House Committee on Un-American Activities in the Armed
Forces for 1946 and 1947 reveal the dociling effect of fluorides in the
water supplies at military bases on American troops.
1946 Water fluoridation proponents claim no benefits for people over 9 years
of age, promising the magic effect of fluorides occurred prior to eruption
of teeth. Despite this claim, all U.S. military reservations, populated by
adults, were heavily fluoridated.
1946 Six more U.S. cities "allowed" to fluoridate their water supplies.
1947 ALCOA lawyer Oscar Ewing is appointed head of the Federal Security
Agency, later HEW, a position that places him in charge of the Public Health
Service. Under Ewing, a national fluoridation campaign rapidly materializes,
spearheaded by the Public Health Service. Over the next three years, 87
additional cities were fluoridated, including the control city of Muskegon in
the original Michigan experiment, thus wiping out the most scientifically
objective test of safety and "benefit" before the test was half over.
Ewing's public relations strategist for the fluoride campaign was Edward L. Bernays, Sigmund Freuds nephew, who pioneered Freudian theory toward
advertising and government propaganda. (See Bernay's, 1928 and his book
Propaganda). Because of Bernay's people would be induced to forget that
fluorides were toxic poisons. Opponents to the fluoride program were painted
as "deranged". In 1996 they would be painted as "civil rights activists".
1947 Forrestal appointed Secretary of Defense. Asked to resign in 1949 after
noting forces planning the war in Korea. See 1949. Later murdered. Forrestal
was very much opposed to the use of fluorides on military bases to keep the
troops docile. (York Daily Times, Letters to the Editor from former FBI
agent Wesley C. Trollope, Omaha, Neb., March 17, 1967).
1948 Study done in England where bone defects in three groups of school boys
were studied. Two groups were from districts where the water supply was
practically free of fluorine. The third group was from the town of Launton,
where the natural water supply contains 1ppm of fluorine (the same as the
level deemed "safe" by the U.S. Public Health Service). X-ray examination
revealed that 20 percent of the first two groups had mild non-specific
spinal irregularities. In the third group, the one consuming 1ppm fluoride
in their water, 64% were found to have spinal defects, and lesions were more
1948 A censored version of the Manhattan Project fluoride safety study is
published in the August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association.
Comparison with the previously classified version in 1997 indicates that the
U.S. Atomic Energy Commission did censor damaging information on fluorides.
Ref: Fluorides, Teeth and the Atomic Bomb, 1997.
1948 John McCone becomes Secretary of Defense of the United States. McCone
gives contracts to Standard Oil and Kaiser Aluminum, in which he already has
financial interests. Aluminum manufacture by-products, fluorides, would be
added to the population water supplies to induce submission by damaging the
brain and stem resistence to domination by global socialism.
1950 The 24th edition of the U.S. Dispensatory (pp 1456-1457)defines
fluorides as "violent poisons to all living tissue because of their
precipitation of calcium. They cause fall of blood pressure, respiratory
failure, and general paralysis. Continous ingestion of non-fatal doses
causes permanent inhibition of growth ... the use of fluoride-containing
dentifrices and internal medicants is not justified." In subsequent
editions, the editors removed this entire portion. Why? Science and biology
doesn't change. Political agendas do.
1950 The publication Science features research by C.W. Sheppard which
indicates that fluorides "lower hemoglobin and may cause irreversible loss
of potassium from the red cells."
1950 Alcoa Aluminum's Vancouver, Washington plant is found guilty of dumping
7,000 pounds of toxic fluorides each month into the Columbia River.
According to the December 15, 1952 Seattle Times, "the fluoride contaminated
the grass and forage and resulted in injury and death to cattle." See 1957
1950 The U.S. Public Health Service officially publicly endorses the concept
of the addition of fluorides to public water supplies.
1950 The Seventh Annual Report of the Sugar Research Foundation recognizes
sugar as the major cause of tooth decay. The SRF furnishes grants to the
Harvard Department of Nutrition to "solve the tooth decay problem without
restricting sugar consumption". The result of these grants was the
advocating of water fluoridation.
1950 From 1950 to 1951, ALCOA advertises sodium fluoride for addition to
1950 The Seventh Annual Report of the Sugar Research Foundation (130
corporations) expresses its "aim in dental research" : to discover means of
controlling tooth decay by methods other than restricting sugar intake. Two
institutions most aggressive in promotion of water fluoridation, the Dental
Schools of Harvard and the University of Rochester, receive large grants for
fluoride research from the sugar industry.
1950 Soviets add fluorides to water in prison system to maintain
subservience in the inmate population, affect the central nervous system
and produce compliance with authority. Fluorides shipped from
the US via Alaska, starting in the 1940's, to the Soviets for use in their
Gulag prison system. The U.S. continues to promote addition of fluorides to
public water supplies.
A professional's opinion on Fluoride in your water...
Want to see
the rest up to 1997? Then enter here please....
Fluoride Deception = Poison in Your Water
ATTENTION 'BRITA' FILTER USERS
- Did you know your Brita filter was designed to deliberately allow
fluoride to pass through into your drinking water? Read the label to
find out for yourself......
"The Brita Filter keeps a healthy level of fluoride, a
water additive that promotes strong teeth....."
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A mix of
bacteria-killing viruses can be safely sprayed on cold cuts, hot dogs and
sausages to combat common microbes that kill hundreds of people a year,
federal health officials said Friday in granting the first-ever approval of
viruses as a food additive.
Do we really need to tremble in dread that our Earth is getting warmer? Are we really
Earth is heating up lately, but so are Mars, Pluto and other worlds in
our solar system, leading some scientists to speculate that a change
in the sun's activity is the common thread linking all these baking
The Global Warming Scam
by Nima Sanandaji and Fred Goldberg
March 18, 2006
The media portrays a dramatic image of how the ice is melting in the polar
regions as a consequence of global warming. We are warned that the North
Pole might become ice-free during the summer months at the end of this
century and that the polar bears might become extinct due to this development.
But is this really a realistic image? Sure, there is research that indicates
that the ice sheets are being reduced, but there are also studies that show
the complete opposite. An example of this is a study in the scientific journal
Geophysical Research Letter where the Swedish researcher Peter Winsor compares
data collected by submarines below the Arctic ice. His conclusions are that
the thickness of the ice has been almost constant between 1986 and 1997.
If you look at the South Pole there are studies that show an increase in
mass of the ice. In a study published in the journal Nature a number of
polar researchers showed that they had observed a net cooling of 0.7
in the region between 1986 and 2000. Another study published in Science
showed that the East-Antarctic ice sheet had grown 45 million metric tones
between 1992 and 2003.
Are the ices growing or melting? The simple
answer is that there exist studies that point to both directions, perhaps
indicating that scientists know relatively little about global climate.
But what counts to most ordinary people is what media is reporting, and media is often highlighting the most alarming studies and seldom report of
studies that go against the notion that human activity leads to global
warming. To put it simply, the news is filtered through an
environmentalist [Globalist] view of the world.
An interesting example of how media sometimes gets it wrong is how journalists reported that there had never been so little ice in the Arctic than in 2005.
This claim was based on satellite images by NASA which showed that the
geographic extent of the ice sheet had never been so small since measurement
began in 1979. One must however keep in fact that about half of the ice in the
Arctic melts each summer and that two months before this
measurement the extent of the ice sheet was the same as the previous year.
The problem is that satellite images show the surface of the ice but not the
Capten Årnell at the summer expedition with the polar-ship Oden could tell that
he had never seen so much ice in the Arctic than in 2005. It was with
great difficulty that he had passed through the region. What had happened in
2005 seems to be that the ice had packed densely against the Canadian part
of the Arctic. The geographical extent had been reduced but the ice was
As for polar bears, much points to that their numbers are increasing rather
than diminishing. Mitch Taylor, a Canadian expert on animal populations,
estimates that the number of polar bears in Canada has increased from 12,000 to
15,000 the past decade. Steven C Amstrup and his college have studied a
population of polar bears in Alaska and reported that the number of females had
increased from 600 to 900 between 1976 and 1992. Even a report from the WWF
which is entitled "Polar bears at risk" and warns that the populations of the
polar bears might become extinct due to global warming, supports that the number
of polar bears is increasing. In the report the polar bears in the world are
divided into 20 populations. It shows out that only 2 of these populations are
decreasing, while 10 are stable, 5 are growing and 3 are not possible to comment
Global climate is an important issue to debate, but it is sad that what is
communicated often has a clear shifting towards the worst-case scenarios and the
doomsday theories. There is no reason to scare people by giving them only one
side of the argument.
Do you all remember when these 'exalted
scientists' tried to scare us all with global cooling not many years ago?
In his 1976 book The Cooling, Lowell Ponte, writer and journalist wrote: "This cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people. If it continues and no strong action is taken, it will cause world famine, world chaos and world war, and this could all come about before the year 2000."
The Tempest By Joel Achenbach Sunday, May 28, 2006; W08 As evidence mounts that humans are causing dangerous changes in Earth's climate,
a handful of sceptics are providing some serious blowback
FACTOID - Mount Pinatubo's volcano alone, in 1991,
spewed out more greenhouse gases that SEVEN years worth of all Canadian
factories and cars combined.. If we were to take every vehicle off the road
(cars, motorcycles, heavy duty trucks, etc.) we would not even make a one (1)
percent dent in the total annual emissions of greenhouse gases, including
Climate expert says humans not to blame for Global
Jeff Poor, Business & Media Institute, March 5, 2008
It turns out Al Gore was wrong. The scientists aren’t all in agreement on global warming; thus there is no “consensus.”
Prominent hurricane forecaster Dr. William M. Gray, a professor at Colorado State University, told the audience at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change on March 4 in New York that a natural cycle of ocean water temperatures related to the salinity (the amount of salt) in ocean water was responsible for some global warming that has taken place. However, he said that same cycle means a period of cooling would begin within 10 years. [full report]
New Evidence Discredits Global Warming Dogma - theTrumpet.com, Mar. 25,08
On national radio in Australia, Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs, dropped a bombshell on those who support global warming: While carbon dioxide levels have risen for the last 10 years, the Earth has cooled, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change knows it.
Reid A. Bryson holds the 30th PhD in Meteorology granted in the history of American education. Emeritus Professor and founding chairman of the University of Wisconsin Department of Meteorology—now the Department of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences—in the 1970s he became the first director of what’s now the UW’s Gaylord Nelson Institute of Environmental Studies. He’s a member of the United Nations Global 500 Roll of Honor—created, the U.N. says, to recognize “outstanding achievements in the protection and improvement of the environment.” He has authored five books and more than 230 other publications and was identified by the British Institute of Geographers as the most frequently cited climatologist in the world.
“Climate’s always been changing and it’s been changing rapidly at various times, and so something was making it change in the past,” he told us in an interview this past winter. “Before there were enough people to make any difference at all, two million years ago, nobody was changing the climate, yet the climate was changing, okay?”
“All this argument is the temperature going up or not, it’s absurd,” Bryson continues. “Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air.”
The United Nations released a report at the end of 1996 saying Global Warming
was a fact, yet before releasing the report two key paragraphs were deleted from
the final draft.
Those two paragraphs, written by the scientists who did the actual scientific
1. "none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases."
2. "no study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to ...man-made causes."
Other comments found in the UN report are as follows:
New studies show that methane emissions from natural wetlands have serious
implications for global warming. Methane, an important greenhouse gas, is
produced in summer from wetlands in western Siberia, leading to high atmospheric
concentrations. (Dallimore and Collett, 1995).
There are large margins of error in calculating natural sources and sinks, such
that an accurate calculation for terrestrial sources and sinks is not presently
possible (ENB, 1997).
Are you green? How many flights have you taken in the last year? Feeling guilty about all those unnecessary car journeys? Well, maybe ... there's no need to feel bad. According to a group of scientists brought together by documentary-maker Martin Durkin, if the planet is heating up, it isn't your fault and there's nothing you can do about it. We've almost begun to take it for granted that climate change is a man-made phenomenon. But just as the environmental lobby think they've got our attention, a group of naysayers have emerged to slay the whole premise of global warming.
Appearing in a film in which a melting iceberg spoils a
transatlantic cruise has apparently transformed its star, rookie ABC News
journalist Leonardo DiCaprio, into an expert on global warming. Somewhat less
credible is a claim made by Vice President Al Gore in a new and scary foreword
of his 1992 book Earth in the Balance.
Warning of "a catastrophic mutation in our physical and human geography," Gore
claims that unless climate changes are halted, sea levels could rise high
enough to cause an "inundation of major areas of coastal cities such as Miami,
New York, and Los Angeles." Trouble is that his science is all wet, inundated
Driving the seemingly unending climate-treaty negotiations, the most widely
feared consequence of global warming appears to be a catastrophic rise in sea
level. Environmental advocacy groups are filling television’s air waves with
lurid images of flooding of Bangladesh and Pacific islands, and raising the
specter of hundreds of millions of environmental refugees demanding care and
compensation. Even some sober scientists, although not endorsing such obvious
scare stories, predict an acceleration of the ongoing global rise, which a
system of tidal gauges places at about 18 cm (7 inches) per century. The 1996
report of the IPCC, the U.N. science advisory group, projects a "best-value"
rise by 2100 of about 50 cm (20 inches).
But recent observations and new analyses of existing data suggest an opposite
outcome: A climate warming should slow down sea level rise, not accelerate it.
To understand this counterintuitive result, one must first get rid of false
leads -- just like in a detective story. The misleading argument here is the
oft-quoted statement that the climate warmed by 1 F (0.6 C) in the last 100
years AND that the sea level rose by 18 cm. Both parts of the statement are
true; but the second part does not necessarily follow from the first.
The first clue that there might be something amiss with the logic is hidden in
the IPCC report itself. According to its compilation of data, the contribution
to the sea level rise of the past century comes mainly from three sources:
first, thermal expansion of the warming ocean contributed about 4 cm; and
second, the melting of continental glaciers about 3.5 cm. The third source,
however, polar regions, produced a net lowering of the sea level, with most of
this coming from the Antarctic. (The mechanism is intuitively easy to
understand but difficult to calculate: A warming ocean evaporates more water,
and some of it rains out in the polar regions, thus transferring water from
the ocean to the polar ice caps.) The surprising result: When one simply adds
up all these contributions listed in the IPCC report (neglecting the large
uncertainties), they account for only about 20 percent of the observed rise of
18 cm. Therefore, the climate warming since 1900 cannot be the cause of the
sea level rise; something is missing here.
The second clue comes from geological observations that the sea level has been
rising for past centuries at about the same rate as in the last 100 years. In
other words, the sea level was rising even during the cold Little Ice Age,
from about 1400 to 1850. This provides further support for the hypothesis that
the observed global sea level rise since 1900 is reasonably independent of
this century’s temperature rise.
The explanation for this riddle had been suspected for some time, based on
historic data of sea level rise derived independently from measurements of
coral growth and from isotope determinations of global ice volume. But the
picture was filled in only recently through published estimates of the rate of
melting of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS), by tracing its shrinkage since
the end of the last ice age.
We can therefore describe the broad scenario as follows: The strong
temperature increase that followed the peak of the last ice age about 18,000
years ago has melted enough ice to raise the global sea level by 120 meters
(360 feet). The rate of rise was quite high at first, controlled by the rapid
melting away of the ice sheets covering North America and the Eurasian land
mass. These disappeared about 8000 years ago; but then, as the sea level rose,
the WAIS continued to melt, albeit at a lower rate -- and it is still melting
at about this rate today.
The principal conclusion is that this melting of the WAIS will continue for
another 7000 years or so, unless another ice age takes over before then. And
there is nothing that we can do to stop this future sea level rise! It is as
inevitable as the ocean tides. Fortunately, coral reefs will continue to grow,
as they have in the past, to keep up with the sea level rise. The rest of us
will just have to adapt, as our ancestors did some 10,000 years ago. At least
we are better equipped to deal with environmental changes.
A final note: What about the effects of human-induced global warming on the
sea level rise? Will it really increase the rate above its natural value, as
predicted by the IPCC? We do have a handle on this question by observing what
actually happened when the climate warmed sharply between 1900 and 1940,
before cooling between 1940 and 1975. The answer is quite surprising and could
not have been derived from theory or from mathematical models. The data
clearly show that the sea level rise slowed down when the climate warmed and
accelerated when the climate cooled. Evidently, ocean-water thermal expansion
and mountain-glacier melting were less important than ice accumulation on the
Antarctic continent (which lowers the sea level).
By analogy, a hypothetical future warming produced by an increase in
greenhouse gases would give the same result: i.e., reduce the rate of rise of
sea level. This is not a recommendation to burn more coal in order to save
Venice from drowning. It is a modest appeal that we all take note of new
scientific developments and recognize that the drastic limits on energy use
called for by climate-treaty negotiators will not stop the rising seas.
S. Fred Singer, an atmospheric physicist, is
professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia,
adjunct scholar at the National Center for Policy Analysis, and former
director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service. He is also a research fellow
at the Independent Institute and author of Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming’s
Unfinished Debate (The Independent
Alarmists want to destroy the environment in order to save the environment
Climate change alarmists have never been apt to shy away from courting controversy with their dire forecasts of coming environmental apocalypse, but their latest "solution" takes the biscuit - they want to pollute the air with sulphur and cut down pristine beautiful old growth forests to stop global warming! [full report]
In Al Gore's America, any "global warming denier" is guilty until proven innocent. He or she must have been bought off by Big Oil. Sceptics, no matter how well-qualified, must prove the negative about really silly alarmist hogwash. And whenever some prediction is falsified, the warm mongers have an explanation: it's just a temporary glitch in the data. Oh, yes, we were wrong about 1998, but just wait till 2050! The excuses are endless. [full report]
driven by the significantly positive trend of the much larger
east Antarctic ice sheet, the ice volume of the entire continent grew
ever larger over the last five years of the 20th century, the majority
of which increase, according to Davis and Ferguson, was due to increased
Until such time as new data might indicate otherwise,
therefore, we have no reason to believe anything different from what
they have concluded, i.e., that the mass of Antarctica's grounded ice
sheet has been steadily growing over the past quarter-century.
With respect to what Jevrejeva et al.
describe as "the discussion on whether sea level rise is
accelerating," their results pretty much answer the question in
the negative; and in further support of this conclusion, they
note that "Church et al. (2004) pointed out that
with decadal variability in the computed global mean sea level, it
is not possible to detect a significant increase in the rate of sea
level rise over the period 1950-2000," as is clearly evident from
the bottom portion of the above figure.
These observations make us wonder why late 20th-century
global warming - which climate alarmists describe as having been unprecedented over the past two millennia - cannot be
detected in global sea level data.
Gore repeatedly labels carbon dioxide (CO2) as “global
warming pollution” when, in reality, it is no more pollution
than is oxygen. CO2 is plant food, an ingredient essential
for photosynthesis without which Earth would be a lifeless,
frozen ice ball. The hypothesis that human release of CO2 is a
major contributor to global warming is just that – an unproven
hypothesis, against which evidence is increasingly mounting.
In fact, the supposedly convincing cause and effect
relationship between CO2 and temperature that Gore speaks about
so confidently is simply non-existent over all meaningful
time scales. University of Ottawa climate researcher,
Professor Jan Veizer demonstrated that, over geologic time, the
two are not linked at all. Over the intermediate time scales
Gore focuses on, the ice cores show that CO2 increases don’t
precede, and therefore don’t cause, warming. Rather they follow
temperature rise - by as much as 800 years. Even in the past
century, the correlation is poor – the planet actually cooled
between 1940 and 1980 when human emissions of CO2 were
rising at the fastest rate in our history.
About 95 percent of the greenhouse effect (search)
— the atmospheric warming due to the trapping of solar
energy that makes life possible on Earth — is due to
water vapor, 99.999 percent of which is of natural
The other 5 percent of the greenhouse effect is due to
carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other
Although carbon dioxide is the most dominant of these
gases by volume, comprising about 99.4 percent, the other
gases trap more heat. So the contribution of carbon dioxide
to the 5 percent of the greenhouse effect not due to water
vapor is much less than 99.4 percent — it's about 72
Carbon dioxide, therefore, is responsible for roughly 3.6 percent of the greenhouse effect (5 percent,
representing the percentage of the greenhouse effect not due
to water vapor, multiplied by 72 percent, representing the
percentage of that 5 percent due to carbon dioxide).
But carbon dioxide is produced both naturally and by
humans. About 97 percent of atmospheric carbon dioxide is
natural, in fact. Only about 3 percent is from human
That means that only about 0.11 percent of the
greenhouse effect (that is, 3 percent of 3.6 percent) is due
to human releases of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Put another way, about 99.89 percent of the
greenhouse effect has nothing to do with carbon-dioxide
emissions from human activity.
[Further breakdown of these numbers puts
North America's contribution to this remaining fraction, at
approximately 25 percent of the world total. In other words, even if we
were to magically cut emissions by 100 percent, it would have a
negligible affect on global carbon-dioxide production.
China contributes nearly the same volume of
greenhouse gases of the United States, and is projected to significantly
surpass the US by 2025, yet China is exempt from Kyoto. Why? Perhaps
because China already has complete political and financial control of
its population, and the real goal of Kyoto is promotion of
global government and taxation programs needed to fund it.
"NRSP's first campaign is focused on dispelling the notion that
Canada needs CO2 reduction plans. CO2 is very unlikely to be a
substantial driver of climate change and is not a pollutant. Global
climate change is primarily a natural phenomenon and so governments
should focus on solving environmental problems over which we have
influence (air, land and water pollution being obvious examples)." http://www.nrsp.com/strategy.html
_______What the impartial science shows_______
About 95 percent of the greenhouse effect - the atmospheric warming due to the trapping of solar energy that makes life possible on Earth - is due to water vapor, 99.999 percent of which is of natural origin. The other 5 percent of the greenhouse effect is due to carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other miscellaneous gases.
Although carbon dioxide is the most dominant of these gases by volume, comprising about 99.4 percent, the other gases trap more heat. So the contribution of carbon dioxide to the 5 percent of the greenhouse effect not due to water vapor is much less than 99.4 percent - it's about 72 percent.
Carbon dioxide, therefore, is responsible for roughly 3.6 percent of the greenhouse effect (5 percent, representing the percentage of the greenhouse effect not due to water vapor, multiplied by 72 percent, representing the percentage of that 5 percent due to carbon dioxide).
But carbon dioxide is produced both naturally and by humans. About 97 percent of atmospheric carbon dioxide is natural, in fact. Only about 3 percent is from human activity.
That means that only about 0.11 percent of the greenhouse effect (that is, 3 percent of 3.6 percent) is due to human releases of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Put another way, about 99.89 percent of the greenhouse effect has nothing to do with carbon-dioxide emissions from human activity.
Factoring in the other greenhouse gases, the total human contribution to the greenhouse effect is about 0.3 percent. In other words, about 99.7 percent of the greenhouse effect is due entirely to nature.
When you consider that the greenhouse effect contributes about 60 degrees Fahrenheit to the Earth's average temperature (which would be about zero degrees Fahrenheit without the greenhouse effect), it doesn't really seem like atmospheric carbon dioxide levels - even if they triple or quadruple because of human activities - are all that important to global climate.
If the carbon dioxide-emissions reductions called for by the Kyoto global warming treaty were implemented, human greenhouse contributions would be reduced by about 0.03 percent. Atmospheric physicist Fred Singer says this would have an "imperceptible effect on future temperatures - one-twentieth of a degree by 2050."
Gore’s home uses more than 20 times the national average
Last night, Al Gore’s global-warming documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, collected an Oscar for best documentary feature, but the Tennessee Center for Policy Research has found that Gore deserves a gold statue for hypocrisy.
Gore’s mansion, located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).
In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home.
The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.
Click Headline for full article.....
As we predicted, the call goes out for global government
and global tax to "save us from eminent disaster".... Now you know who
is paying for this propaganda. The 'left of the spectrum' folks don't like a
Bush style global government, so they repackage the idea in a form that appeals
to the left - and its working.
Spann does not believe that human
activity is contributing to global warming and contends, "billions
of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on
the man-made global warming bandwagon." Bull’s-eye!
An experiment by
Danish scientists offers convincing evidence linking global
warming to an increase in cosmic radiation
Last week, the Danish National Space Center released the
results of an experiment that demonstrates how cosmic rays
could influence natural warming. In so doing, it ruptured a
bedrock of some in the AWG camp. As put by Eigil Friis-Christensen,
director of the Danish National Space Center, "Some said
there was no conceivable way in which cosmic rays could
influence cloud cover. [Our] experiment now shows how they
do so, and should help to put the cosmic-ray connection
firmly onto the agenda of international climate research."
.....a change in solar activity affects more than the
light the sun emits. It also changes the sun's magnetosphere
that sweeps out past the Earth and partly shields us from
the harmful high-energy cosmic radiation originating from
supernovae deep in the Milky Way. The theory is that these
cosmic rays affect our climate by ionizing particles and
gases in our atmosphere. These ionized molecules act as
nucleation points for water droplets and lead to the
formation of clouds. Clouds reflect sunlight back into space
and have by far the greatest impact on the Earth's energy
balance and climate. Changes in solar activity, then, have a
second and more potent impact on our climate through changes
in the cosmic ray flux and thus on cloudiness.
The so-called scientific consensus that global warming is man-made has been shattered with the release of a major new study backed by three universities which concludes that climate change over the past thirty years is explained by natural factors and that attempts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are irrelevant.
Climate scientists at the University of Rochester, the University of Alabama, and the University of Virginia report that temperature fluctuations over the past three decades are not consistent with greenhouse model predictions and more closely correlate with solar activity.
Christopher S. Bentley - JBS Wednesday, April 11, 2007
In the past two weeks, there have been fishing boats stranded in sea ice in the Arctic, fire hydrants have popped out of the ground in unseasonably cold Anchorage, Alaska, frost and cold temperatures have devastated peach and apple orchards in the midwest and south, and parts of the upper midwest are under a late-season winter storm warning with major accumulations of snow expected in the next 24 hours.
What's going on? Isn't the world literally on fire, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)?
The Boston Globe's Ellen
writes an op-ed denouncing anyone who dares dissent against the
God-like authoratitive status of the UN report on climate change (the
same UN that will reap billions in taxes that wouldn't even solve the
problem [of human cause] if it existed in the first place).
I would like to say we're at a point
where global warming is impossible to deny. Let's just say that
global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers,
though one denies the past and the other denies the present and
Looking at annual global temperatures, it is apparent that the last decade shows no warming trend and recent successive annual global temperatures are well within each year's measurement errors. Statistically the world's temperature is flat.
Comment: On the one hand they tell
us that we're all going to be underwater, and on the other they tell us that
there are droughts and our water consumption has to be regulated. Both are
baloney but what they have in common is CONTROL of populations, and that is
what we need to be most worried about here. Our Earth has frequently adjusted
temperatures, and thanks to the wondrous hydro-cycle, it has always
maintained a relatively stable living environment.
DOZENS of the world’s cities, including
London and New York, could be flooded by the end of the century, according to
research which suggests that global warming will increase sea levels more
rapidly than was previously thought.
The first study to combine computer models
of rising temperatures with records of the ancient climate has indicated that
sea levels could rise by up to 20ft (6m) by 2100, placing millions of people
The threat comes from melting ice sheets in Greenland
and Antarctica, which scientists behind the research now believe are on track
to release vast volumes of water significantly more quickly than older models
have predicted. Their analysis of events between 129,000 and 116,000 years
ago, when the Arctic last warmed to temperatures forecast for 2100, shows that
there could be large rises in sea level.
While the Greenland ice sheet is expected to
start melting as summer temperatures in the Arctic rise by 3C degrees to 5C
(5.4F-9F), most models suggest that the ice sheets of Antarctica will remain
The historical data, however, show that the last time
that Greenland became this warm, the sea level rise generated by meltwater
destabilised the Antarctic ice, leading to a much higher increase than can be
explained by Arctic ice alone.
That means that the models of sea-level rise used to
predict an increase of up to 3ft by 2100 may have significantly underestimated
its ultimate extent, which could be as great as 20ft.
Such a rise would threaten cities such as London, New
York, Bombay and Tokyo. Large parts of the Netherlands, Bangladesh and Florida
would be inundated, and even smaller rises would flood extreme low-lying
areas, such as several Pacific islands and New Orleans.
“Although the focus of our work is polar, the
implications are global,” said Bette Otto-Bliesner, of the US National Centre
for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, who led the study. “These ice
sheets melted before and sea levels rose. The warmth needed isn’t that much
above present conditions.”
Her colleague, Jonathan Overpeck, of the University of
Arizona, said: “This is a real eye-opener set of results. The last time the
Arctic was significantly warmer than the present day, the Greenland ice sheet
melted back the equivalent of two to three metres (6ft-10ft) of sea level.
Contrary to what was previously believed, the research suggests the Antarctic
ice sheet also melted substantially, contributing another 6ft to 10ft of sea
The findings, which are published today in the journal
Science, have emerged from a study that used data from ancient coral reefs,
ice cores and other natural records to reconstruct the climate during the last
gap between Ice Ages. In this interglacial period, between 129,000 and 116,000
years ago, temperatures in the Arctic were between 3C and 5C above present
levels — a similar level to that predicted for the end of this century.
The scientists found that meltwater from Greenland
raised the sea level by up to 11ft, but coral records showed that the total
global rise was between 13ft and 20ft. Dr Overpeck said that the melting of
Antarctic ice sheets was the most likely explanation. As sea levels rose, the
floating ice shelves off the coast of the continent would have become more
likely to break up. That in turn would have allowed glaciers to dump more ice
from the continent itself into the sea.
He said that this was particularly worrying at present
as the base of the West Antarctic ice sheet lay below sea level, which would
allow ice to escape to the sea easily.
Several recent studies have indicated that the
Greenland ice sheet, which contains enough water to raise sea levels by 23ft,
and the West Antarctic sheet, which holds enough for a 20ft rise, are
thinning. Both are expected to take several centuries to melt completely, but
could release substantial quantities of water by 2100.
Dr Overpeck said that the results added to the urgency
of measures to control the greenhouse gas emissions contributing to global
The book's main
character, a young boy, is featured getting so worried about a coming
manmade climate disaster that he yells “I don’t want to hear anymore!”
The new children’s book, entitled “Tore and the Town on Thin Ice” ((http://www.unep.org/PDF/TORE.pdf))
is published by the United Nations Environment Programme and blames “rich
countries” for creating a climate catastrophe and urges children to join
Edwards: Global Warming Will Make World War Look Like Heaven
French police stop placing explosives in luggage for
airport dog training
Canadian Press -
Sunday, December 05, 2004
PARIS (AP) - French police on Sunday ended their practice of hiding plastic
explosives in air passengers' luggage to train bomb-sniffing dogs after one
such bag got lost, possibly ending up on a flight out of Paris' Charles de
The luggage that police used Friday for the exercise has yet to turn up. Three
flights that arrived in Los Angeles and New York were searched, but it was not
found. And no passenger has contacted French authorities to report the
surprise discovery of a bag containing nearly 150 grams of explosives tucked
into his or her suitcase.
Police say there was no chance the explosives could go off, since they were
not connected to detonators. Still, Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin was
critical of the mistake.
"The fight against terrorism and insecurity is a priority for the government,"
a statement by his office said. "But (Raffarin) made clear his concern in the
face of the way the training for explosives searches was conducted at Roissy
Charles de Gaulle."
Raffarin said the procedure was "susceptible to making the relevant passenger
run a risk in the eyes of foreign authorities when arriving in the destination
Police soon after announced they'd ordered a stop.
"The procedures that were used Friday night will no longer be allowed," said
Pierre Bouquin, a spokesman for France's police force known as gendarmes, who
conducted the training. "We're going to stop practising this on the bags of
travellers" in all of France, he said.
Airport police deliberately placed a bag containing explosives into a
passenger's luggage early Friday evening, Bouquin said. The luggage was lost
on a conveyor belt carrying bags through a restricted area from check-in to
The explosives could have made it onto one of up to 90 flights leaving Charles
de Gaulle airport. Police didn't know the bag's destination and quickly
alerted the relevant airlines.
Two police officers faced disciplinary action because of the incident, Bouquin
Check out this video clip.... It's hysterical, and really shows the
government as a bunch of bumpkins....
The Daily Show's John Stewart classified the Miami terror cell that were
about to "wage a ground war against America," according to Gonzales as
"seven dipsh*ts in a warehouse," following a farcical press conference in
which Gonzeles was cornered into admitting that they had no links to any
Al-Qaeda members and had no weapons or explosives to carry out any acts of
If these issues in any way matter to you, would you please help us pay for our operating costs with a donation of YOUR choosing... Your donations are used to continue our work to expose the truth, and defend your Rights. Either click 'make a donation' button, or
consider buying some books on sale from Amazon. Thank You!