|
Thermite Identified As Culprit Of WTC Collapse - Watch Video A new branch of 9/11 research claims to have identified the cause of the collapse of the twin towers. The photographic and video evidence makes a very strong case for thermite being responsible for the unprecedented implosions of steel framed reinforced buildings on September 11. Thermite Identified As Culprit Of WTC Collapse Evidence mounting that cause first identified on Alex Jones Show led to towers' implosion Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 24 2006 A new branch of 9/11 research claims to have identified the cause of the collapse of the twin towers. The photographic and video evidence makes a very strong case for thermite being responsible for the unprecedented implosions of steel framed reinforced buildings on September 11. This facet was first brought to light during a November 2005 appearance on The Alex Jones Show by Brigham Young University physicist Professor Steven Jones. Jones said that white phosphorous wasn't powerful enough to cause the implosion but that thermite was the likely culprit. Alex Jones's 2005 release Martial Law 9/11 Rise of the Police State highlighted the physical evidence that the towers and Building 7 were brought down with incendiary devices. Brigham Young University physicist Professor Steven Jones told peers at a Utah meeting that, "while almost no fire, even one ignited by jet fuel, can cause structural steel to fail, the combination of thermite and sulfur "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter." Jones points to a video (click here to watch) which shows a bright yellow molten substance dripping from the south tower minutes before its collapse. Government investigators claimed that this was aluminum from Flight 175 but Jones is adamant that aluminum is silvery in appearance and doesn't turn yellow. Jones also told the Deseret News that sulfur traces found at ground zero indicates the thermite was combined with sulphur to make it burn even hotter than the normal 2500 degrees Celsius. Jones stated that thermite was a "clever" choice because its ingredients, aluminum and iron oxide do not require identifying tags by law, meaning they couldn't be traced back to their manufacturers. Watch the following video and observe how thermite completely melts a car engine in a matter of seconds, without the addition of sulphur, and also completely resists neutralization by liquid nitrogen. Notice how the dripping substance is identical to that seen in the south tower video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrCWLpRc1yM&eurl= The following video highlights the fact that steaming hot molten metal was still being found at the World Trade Center site six weeks after the attack. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ&eurl= Jones also, "cited video pictures showing white ash rising from the south tower near the dripping, liquefied metal. When thermite burns, Jones said, it releases aluminum-oxide ash. The presence of both yellow-white molten iron and aluminum oxide ash "are signature characteristics of a thermite reaction," he said." American Free Press writer Christopher Bollyn discusses evidence of thermite used to sever the twin tower's steel support columns in the picture below.
White flames consistent with how thermite reacts producing molten iron and aluminum oxide are also visible in this photograph at the corner of the 81st floor of the south tower.
The What Really Happened website created a page giving more proof that thermite was used and how it runs parallel with eyewitness reports of explosions and pieces being sheered off the towers. An additional video shows white smoke (pictured) at the base of the north tower moments before its collapse. White smoke also rose from the wreckage of the towers. It is now all but conclusive that the master architects of 9/11 used thermite to implode the towers, going the extra length to pull off the pyrotechnic horror show and enhance the media spectacle of 'the new Pearl Harbor,' instilling greater fear and fealty that enabled them to subsequently enact their domestic and geopolitical agenda. ____________________________
Peer Reviewed Science proves WTC 1&2 and Building 7 taken down by demolition charges!!!! ABSTRACT In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government. Click Here for full report.... UPDATE: Professor Steven Jones has now tested steel samples from two different sites that both clearly show the use of thermate as a tool of implosion and the analysis has been verified by two other universities.
|
"In
this photo, for example, the column directly above the fireman's helmet
shows that it was cut with thermite. There is a substantial amount of
hardened molten iron which can be seen on both the inside and outside of the
box column. This is precisely what one would expect to find on a column
which had been cut with thermite," says Bollyn.
The
USGS Spectroscopy Lab produced images which showed dense thermal hot spots
days and weeks after the attacks.
UPDATE May/07: New and conclusive evidence proves use of "Thermate" in towers collapse... Please read the report from Dr. Steven E. Jones. [pdf format] Below is various excerpts from paper.
In fact my colleagues and I now feel that we have sufficient data to conclude that the collisions of jets with the two Towers are NOT sufficient to explain the complete and rapid collapses of both Towers and WTC 7. We conclude that the evidence is compelling that the destruction of the WTC buildings involved planted cutter charges (such as explosives and incendiaries). We will consider this evidence.2
But of course it is an "unscientific method" when one starts with a conclusion and then finds
just those facts that support that conclusion while ignoring everything else – that is "pathological
science." An obvious example of pathological science is evidently demonstrated by NIST regarding
the collapse of WTC7 (which was not hit by a jet): "fires and damage did it, just look at floors 8 to 46
and tell us how fires made it collapse straight down." No! In a scientific method we gather all the
facts and look at all the floors and test various hypotheses, and we perform experiments. Only then do
we draw conclusions which are solidly based on all the facts and experiments.
Interestingly the 9/11 commission report fails to even mention the collapse of WTC 7. The
NIST report on WTC7 is long overdue. NIST does have photos and videos of the collapse of WTC 7
which they have refused to release despite Freedom of Information Act requests. The excuse is that
while they are still studying this, they will not release the videos and photos of WTC 7. These videos
and photos were obtained mainly from the public at tax payer expense and I strongly suggest the public
should have a chance to look at all the data and we can study this ourselves, thank you.
After the tower has collapsed, you see some of the perimeter walls standing but oddly enough you see
most of these enormous core columns are gone (see photos below). Certainly there are no stacked up floors.
‘Pancaking’, the collapse hypothesis issued in the FEMA report, is not a viable hypothesis which even
NIST explicitly states in their report.23 The ‘pancake-collapse’ hypothesis has been flatly rejected.
Unbelievably, they explicitly state, "it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower
after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached.", and "the results were a simulation of the
structural deterioration of each tower from the time of aircraft impact to the time at which the building
became unstable, i.e., was poised for collapse." 23 For twenty million dollars, one would think that
NIST could have carried the collapse analysis 15 seconds further.
Firefighter Describes "Molten Metal" at Ground Zero, like a "Foundry"
Google Video
Thursday, November 16, 2006
BYU places '9/11 truth' professor on paid leave
VIDEO: Professor Steven Jones On Thermite You Tube | September 11 2006
Alex Jones interviews Professor Steven Jones - a professor of physics at Brigham Young University who conducts research in nuclear fusion and solar energy. Currently, Jones is investigating the hypothesis that the World Trade Center Twin Towers and WTC 7 were brought down by pre-positioned cutter charges.
This video was available first to Prison Planet.tv members. Please click here to subscribe.
Please help us defend your Freedom and Liberty with a donation of
your choosing... Click 'make a donation' button below. Thank You!