WTC 7 was the storage facility for millions of files pertaining to active cases involving international drug dealing, organized crime, terrorism and money laundering.

WTC 6, also known as the Customs House building, housed the Departments of Commerce, Agriculture and Labor and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/FDNY.htm < follow this link!!!

See also: CIA Drug lords...

Below shot [from completely different cameras and angles] of second plane clearly shows what some have called a "pod-like" protuberance under Starboard wing of 767, AS WELL AS an unexplainable shadow running the entire length of the "normally round" plane belly. These "shadows and reflections" are NOT attributable to the normal configuration [wing flange] of this aircraft, and is YET ANOTHER piece of the tapestry of puzzling irregularities surrounding the events of 911. 

Click this link for more detailed pictures showing strange anomaly on starboard side [and ONLY starboard side] of landing gear area.  If it is simply a digital "reflection artefact", why does it appear (in the same location) in multiple videos shot from vastly different angles?

Regardless of anyone's conclusions on the alleged "pod", the plane shown above has other much harder to "explain away" problems: Aside from the lack of windows and round nose crest, as reported by eye witnesses [including an off duty FOX news reporter], the plane's nose is simply too long to be a 767- 200 series jetliner, as "United Airlines" Flight 175  (serial # N612UA) was. Click this link for more details.

What on earth is that circular logo on the nose of the aircraft? If this photo only shows an odd reflection, why did the reporter [See below link] clearly identify a "strange circular logo" on the front of the aircraft? United Airlines aircraft are easily identifiable, even as our blurred photo [above right] would indicate. Click the below link and decide for yourself.

Watch video of FOX news reporter describing problems with this strange aircraft.

Is this above logo the "circular logo" this Fox reporter saw on the windowless plane that hit the south tower? Was this one of the aircraft of scheduled Red/Blue war games and simulated hijackings, that were used as a Trojan horse for false flag terrorism?

See also.... One-Time GOP Insider Claims He Has Sept. 11 'Smoking Gun'

"Missile" on Flight 175 at the World Trade Center - Caught by 4 Different News Sources?

______________

It has been pointed out, quite rightly, by many in the 911 truth movement, that the issues of plane irregularities are (by comparison) of little to moderate value in seeing the greater picture of 'what really happened, and who did it', and furthermore while these issues may never be satisfactorily resolved and/or persuasive, they may in fact distract from those issues that HAVE been factually and scientifically proven, and reveal not just government complicity, but their detailed planning of the events of September 11, 2001.

If you are still trying to make up your mind about government involvement, we suggest you study the following sections first and foremost.

_________

WTC building seven

Thermite and Thermate evidence confirms inside job.

Massive Government archive of prior knowledge comes to light.

NORAD Drills provided cover

Big Picture helps us see the forest, not just a few leaves.

Seismic Data Refutes Official WTC Explanation

________________________________________

More on WTC building 7

WTC 7 Professional Demolition Footage (be patient while this large GIF image downloads)

 

Video blows the lid off the US Government's far-fetched conspiracy theory on the perpetrators of 911!!

"911 IN PLANE SITE" video link < click here

FLIGHT 175 ANOMALIES (what is that 'Pod' attached to belly of plane?)

The first impression is that it might be a trick of light and shadow, so it was important to turn to experts in this field. La Vanguardia, a publication in Barcelona, Spain, published an investigative report from a Spanish University, back in June of 2003. What was their professional opinion? After a thorough digital image analysis, the university experts came to the conclusion that the object mounted to the bottom of this plane was three-dimensional in nature and could not have been caused by shadows or reflections. This brings us to a very interesting point in our investigation and begs us to ask some very serious questions. What is mounted to the underbelly of Flight 175? What purpose did it serve in the attacks?

Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and other news networks provided live video feed of witnesses who claim that they heard other explosions going off in and around the World Trade Center AFTER both planes had struck their respective targets. These witnesses were policemen, firefighters, reporters, and businessmen who were on the scene as the events unfolded and were in a unique position to know the intricacies of what was taking place. One after the other a reporter would ask, “Was that a building collapse or did you hear an explosion.” One right after the next they all came back with the same equally resonant answers - “It sounded like a bomb…” “It sounded like an explosion.” One eyewitness in particular, a physician, who was interviewed live on Fox News said, “I think it was a bomb because there were two of them.”

Where is survelence tape of the "plane" that hit Pentagon?

Upon further examination of this area of the Pentagon, one can clearly count at least five additional security cameras, two of which were unmistakably aimed directly where the plane would have impacted with the Pentagon.

It is also worth mentioning that there was three privately owned security cameras all trained in the direction necessary to capture video of the plane hitting the Pentagon. One at a gas station across I-135, one on the rooftop of the Hilton International Hotel, and another located at the Virginia Department of Transportation, which would have captured the plane descending over Interstate 135. Literally, within only a few minutes after the attack, Federal officials arrived at all three locations and confiscated the videotapes. The contents have never been released to the public.

The abovementioned video caused such a stir within the US "Government" that they poured out waves of misinformation on various 911 forums to discourage people from even watching it, and thereby make up their own minds.

So what else would we expect from a bunch of murdering criminals trying to desperately cover their tracks, and wash the last drops of blood from their hands? Don't give them the satisfaction.

If you would like to download this video for free and use your own common sense about the TRUTH of this great and tragic day, please go to the following link. You will need to download 'Bittorrent' software, and will need a current Divx player, which you can also download free of charge.

http://100777.com/doc/990

911's Older Sister: Operation Northwoods

In 1962, the U.S. Government had a plan called "Operation Northwoods." The plan was to carry out fake terrorist attacks in America, and then blame them on Cuba; the purpose of all this being an excuse to invade Cuba.

They were going to: 

• Hijack planes <<<<
• Fake a Cuban airforce attack on a civilian jetliner
• Shoot people in sniper attacks
• Blow up a ship
• Blow up John Glenn's space capsule
• Attack military bases <<<<

Operation Northwoods is laid out in documents that were signed by the five Joint Chiefs, but it was never carried out.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2002/10/44405.html

______________

According to long-hidden top-secret documents I obtained from the National Archives, Operation Northwoods called for innocent people to be shot on U.S. streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk; for waves of terrorism in Washington, Miami and elsewhere. Using phony evidence to blame Castro, the Joint Chiefs would get their needed pretext.

Each member of the Joint Chiefs signed off on the plan. Then the chairman hand-carried it to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara — who promptly rejected it.

Two years later, U.S. generals were looking for another pretext to go to war, this time in Vietnam. In the summer of 1964, President Lyndon Johnson sought to escalate U.S. involvement in Vietnam's civil war. The decision was made to launch hit-and-run attacks against coastal North Vietnamese targets while a slow-moving destroyer, the USS Maddox, sat just off the shore in international waters. Knowing the North Vietnamese would associate the nearby warship with the attacks, the Pentagon likely hoped to provoke a retaliatory strike against the vessel — the perfect pretext for a declaration of war.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/2002-08-29-usat-opin-bamford_x.htm

______________

Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba.  These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake “Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington,”

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/

__________________________________________________

Operation Gladio

'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

http://www.rense.com/general63/sword.htm