Home
Up

 

Source: http://www.nwointelligence.com

'CFR Plans To Replace The United States And Canada
With A New 'North American Union'

First, some pertinent extracts from the astonishingly-prophetic 1996 interview of John Whitley,
Editor of the 'New World Order Intelligence Update', by Jim Quinn...

 

Quinn: [laughs] Well, yes, that is true. But she [Hilary Clinton] delivered the welcoming address at the Bilderberg meeting down in Georgia, which was written up by the way by one of the small Georgia papers there. We read that article on the air. It was interesting. He chronicled the incredible amount of security that surrounds this meeting.

Whitley: Right.

Quinn: Was anybody there who ratted on what went on?

Whitley: Yes, we've always had good sources. I wouldn't like to be too specific because they're people who very cautiously we've developed links with, and who kind of work at a secondary level but who are directly involved with people who are at the Bilderberger meeting. They are becoming increasingly concerned themselves with where this stuff is going. So, yes, we do find out what's going on. Basically what happened at that meeting was they picked up a theme that was also discussed at Davos and [that] they're really pushing - and this was discussed at the Trilateral meeting in Tokyo, too - they're pushing for three regional governments and for the military anchoring of those...

Quinn: The military anchoring of three regional governments?

Whitley: Yes. The whole idea is that you divide the world up into three governmental zones, and each one will have an enforcement army; and then you merge those government zones into one, and you merge those three armies into one. In essence, you get a three-fold world state. And this has been the long-term plan of the Trilateral Commission, which is how it got its name. They're going along three lines, trilateral, to one World State. And, of course, you've got the Asian Union, the European Union, and coming into existence now, first announced at Davos, privately, is the American Union. Now we did publicly announce this one week after Davos finished, from our own sources. We went on the Internet and in our own Newsletter and we said that it was agreed that there would be a fast-tracking of NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, plus SAFTA, the South American Free Trade Agreement, for a full union by the year 2003, even if just the structure was in place. And that Newt Gringrich would be backing this and that Bill Clinton will be announcing it. A month and a half after Davos, Clinton announced this. So either this was a plan - part of a global plan - or we got very lucky. [laughs] But we seem to get very lucky most of the time, so obviously there is a plan there....

Quinn: From the War Room, the Quinn In The Morning Show continues. We are having a discussion with John Whitley, expert on the New World order, and, Yes, folks, that's it. I've seen all the evidence I need to see. I am now a full-blown kook. Good morning again, John. John Whitley, up in Toronto, Canada. Now, on the subject of the CFR, you were about to say one more thing.

Whitley: Well, Jim, you know, you can't get anywhere in U.S. military life, at the very top of the military structure, the top of the political structure, the people who are publishers and key editors, and even foreign affairs journalists and so forth of the major newspapers, and correspondents for 60 Minutes, all of these people, together with the key people in the CFR in the State Department and so forth, are members of the CFR. So these are the people who, when they get together, they don't get together with the local members in Chicago. They get together with each other and they read the CFR's bimonthly and sometimes more frequent magazine, Foreign Affairs. They basically follow the CFR line in whatever they do. So the American military, the American government, the American press are being run by CFR insiders, and that's the reality. If we're talking about a parallel government, that's what the CFR has been called.

Quinn: The parallel government?

Whitley: America's secret government...

Quinn: All right, now, John, recently of course Ron Brown just died in a plane crash, and shortly after Ron Brown died there was much shredding of documents going on at the Commerce Department. But there were a number of documents that were left intact and they were spirited away from the Commerce department to the small Business administration, where it was hoped nobody would find them, by a fellow by the name of Ira Sokowitz.

Whitley: Uh hm.

Quinn: And I heard a news story the other night where they were listing some of the documents. And among those documents, they said, "were top-secret documents from the Council on Foreign Relations." If the Council on Foreign Relations is not part of the U.S. government, what are documents from that Council doing being classified top secret under the auspices of government security if this is a private sector think tank?

Whitley: I hate to be blunt about this, but basically what happens is the CFR writes policy for the U.S. government, and then that policy is executed by CFR members in the U.S. government. In essence, the CFR advises itself on what it should do and then it does it.

Quinn: Okay, so you believe that's probably what's in those classified documents?

Whitley: Oh, I've no doubt that what's in those documents is very revealing of what will yet happen. See, they're pushing for global free trade by the year 2020. I mean, we're talking about hemispheric free trade - essentially a western hemispheric union for the whole of north, south and central America, with the U.S. Constitution well on its way out and the Bill of Rights long gone, and a new political document covering that whole hemispheric union by the year 2003. But they're talking about this global consummation by the year 2020. I'm sure those documents included those kinds of statements and references and the policies to bring them into place. And they don't want the American public awakened to those things yet.

Quinn: Well, in keeping with our tradition here on this show of telling adult ghost stories by the camp fire, what's the scariest stuff that these people are into?

Whitley: The scariest stuff? Well, you'll recollect - I'm going to digress just slightly here - you remember we were talking about the [U.S. government's] concentration camp program, that we'd done a Report on that, as well, but that was [already] in existence - I think we were talking about that for a brief time on your last program. Clinton was asked by Sarah McClendon [a senior member of the White House press corps] at a March press conference to deny this, to deny all these allegations about the U.S. army being merged with the Russian army, and counties in southern states being given to the U.N. for biospheric reasons [and about the U.S. government's concentration camp program], and so forth. And this is what Clinton had to say. Clinton said, [laughs] "Well, I want Americans to think about this." I'm paraphrasing slightly. "How can we be an independent sovereign nation when we're leading an increasingly interdependent world. This means that Americans are going to have to think about these issues and we're going to have to make some very difficult decisions in the future." Now this was in answer to a question about concentration camps being set up in the United States. So that's the kind of future they've got planned internally. And we've seen the kinds of laws they've tried to force through, the Counter-Terrorism Bill and so forth. We've seen increasing acts of terrorism. Those are the kinds of things that they are planning to unleash upon the North American population because we are too free. And that freedom needs to be restricted and corralled.

We've got, as you rightly said, a tremendous threat from Red China. We've also got the looming threat of a war in Bosnia. They desperately want this. They're going to go after those war criminals, they're going to excite the local Serbs, and they're going to get their war. There's a very real possibility, too, of a nasty conflict in the Middle East which would drive oil prices through the roof. And we have no reserves on hand and nothing available for over a decade apart from [those oil] resources in the Middle East. And, of course, that will send tremendous shocks through the stock market. All of these things help them. So we can expect those things to happen, apart from whatever restrictions they plan to bring in over the next year [because of] the environmental movement...

Quinn: Back now to John Whitley, in Toronto, Canada. A couple of other subjects that were covered at the Bilderberger meeting; ah, Islam....

Whitley: They're maneuvering, of course, to make Islam a big terrorist threat. Islam is something that they've penetrated. Many of the leaders like Khomeini [paid a stipend by the CIA during his "exile" in Paris] were actually CIA-financed and front men. So, you know, it's something they've really been maneuvering to bring into the gap that the Soviet Union has kind of left empty. Plus they need increased terrorism to bring in their recommendations on global governance, which will essentially take our freedom away in exchange for giving us "guaranteed security". in their own words. For that, you need increased terrorism and that is equivalent to "terrorist Islam".

 

New Plan Virtually Eliminates US/Mexico/Canada Borders

Meet NAFTA On Steroids

2004 WorldNetDaily.com
17 November, 2004.

WASHINGTON - North American national borders would be virtually eliminated under plans being considered by senior business and political leaders from Canada, the United States and Mexico for a "NAFTA-plus," continent-wide, customs-free zone with a common approach to trade, energy, immigration, law enforcement and security.

A tri-national task force, chaired by former Liberal Party deputy prime minister John Manley, with the full backing of all three governments, is plotting the roadmap for this new, bolder alliance meant to compete with the European Union. William Weld, former governor of Massachusetts and Pedro Aspe, former Mexican finance minister, join Manley on the panel that reports directly to the Council on Foreign Relations.

The mission has the formal blessing of Tom Ridge, U.S. Homeland Security secretary, who is close with President Bush.

The committee is scheduled to issue its report next spring.

The elimination of borders along the lines of the EU experiment seems to be high on the agenda of the panel.

"I think we've had 11 years of incrementalism, and during that time we've seen the EU expand its borders, eliminate borders among (member) countries and launch a common currency," explains Manley in the diplomatic magazine Embassy. "We're going to have to provide a vision that is more bold than incrementalism. What's the choice? Europe has made enormous steps in the years since NAFTA was signed. China has been going through a transformative process. In Canada, our only leverage is access to the U.S. market. If we're not going to develop and pursue how we use our advantage of location to be the foundation for future prosperity, then we are going to have to figure out another vision."

The "NAFTA-plus" plan has also been referred to as "deep integration." Skeptics see it as a plan to eliminate national sovereignty and erode the American concept of representative government accountable to the people under the framework of the Constitution.

Discussions so far indicate that Canada, under the new agreement, would immediately sign on to the U.S. strategic missile defense initiative. Canada would also make its vast lumber resources available to the U.S. and Mexican markets and provide more open access to the northern neighbor's oil, natural gas and hydro-electric power resources.

[Note: BC's massive lumber giant MacMillan Bloedel was recently sold to American Owned Weyerhaeuser, who's family are long time members of the Skull and Bones - a group committed to global government and tyranny.]  

Other members of the task force include: Canadian Finance Minister Michael Wilson and Nelson Cunningham of Henry Kissinger's consulting firm, Kissinger McLarty Associates.

 

 

We have something U.S. needs


Linda McQuaig,
Toronto Star,
Nov. 14, 2004.

As Ottawa prepares to receive George W. Bush in the next few months, expect lots of lectures about how vital Canada-U.S. trade is and how devastated we'd be if the president were to suddenly shut down the border.

This is designed to convince us of the need to walk on eggshells when he gets here, keep protesters out of sight and perhaps whisk outspoken Liberal MP Carolyn Parrish to an undisclosed location outside the capital.

It will be easy to lose sight of an obvious truth - the U.S. trades with us not because Bush has fond feelings for our political leaders or thinks Canadians are nice people who really like him. It trades with us because it's in the U.S. interest to do so.

I know this doesn't fit with the view that world events turn on the rapport between political leaders. We're told, for instance, that it was Brian Mulroney's Irish charm that convinced Ronald Reagan to support the Canada-U.S. free-trade deal, the forerunner of NAFTA.

And we're now told that it's essential Prime Minister Paul Martin be accommodating so Bush will feel fondly towards Canadians whenever he's contemplating slamming the border shut.

In fact, Bush has no intention of slamming the border shut. That would cut off his Number 1 source of energy.

Commentators here tend to stress how much bigger and more powerful the U.S. is, and how desperately we want access to the American market. True, but the U.S. desperately wants access to our energy.

Few things are more important to U.S. policymakers - particularly in the Bush administration - than access to energy. Their hopes of remaining the dominant superpower, economically and militarily, hinge on access to this most essential commodity. But there's a problem.

Notwithstanding images of swaggering Texas oilmen and Jed Clampett's backyard gusher, the U.S. is short on oil.

It has 3 per cent of the world's oil. But, with their voracious energy appetites, Americans consume 25 per cent of the world's oil. This leaves them heavily dependent on foreign sources. Each year they became more dependent. They now import more than half of all their oil.

This explains why one of the first things Dick Cheney did after assuming the vice-presidency was set up a top-level task force on America's energy security, chaired by himself.

It also explains why, long before 9/11 and the launching of the "war on terror," Cheney and other top figures in the Bush administration were focused on Iraq - the largest remaining untapped oil bonanza on Earth.

But their attention also focused northward. Far from the mayhem of the Middle East lie the vast oil and gas reserves of Canada. Such a co-operative little country. So eager to please. Not an insurgent in sight.

Washington has long coveted our ample energy resources, and it scored a huge victory in the early '90s when it got Ottawa to agree to a provision in NAFTA that prevents us from cutting back our energy exports to the U.S., unless we cut our own consumption by the same amount. So, even if there were a severe oil shortage in parts of Canada, we wouldn't be allowed to cut oil exports to the U.S. and redirect them to shivering Canadians.

This was a stunning capitulation on Canada's part. Not that we don't want to sell our energy south of the border. But why would we be willing to give up our ultimate control over such a precious resource, especially one that may well become scarce in the coming decades?

It's easy to see why NAFTA was regarded as a breakthrough in the U.S., making Canada its largest and most secure supplier of energy.

So it wasn't really Mulroney's Irish charm that won the day. American planners had long dreamed of getting secure access to our energy. Even Reagan could grasp that.

Now the U.S. is back for more. This time it's pushing for a full continental energy pact, under which, among other things, our electricity grids and environmental review processes could be integrated.

And it looks like Canada is once again likely to oblige.

Canada is currently participating in a task force, along with the U.S. and Mexico, to plan the expansion of NAFTA, including a continental energy pact. The task force includes some of Canada's most prominent advocates for deeper Canada-U.S. integration, such as former deputy prime Minister John Manley and business lobbyist Tom d'Aquino.

So it looks like the Americans are about to secure even greater access to our energy. And they'll have done it without sending in a single troop. The only loose cannon they'll have to face is Parrish.

Linda McQuaig is a Toronto-based author and commentator. lmcquaig@sympatico.ca.