The following quote is (was) taken DIRECTLY from Chief "Justice" Finch's website, and reveals the absurd lengths the highest "court" of BC is willing to go to infringe the liberties, rights and customs promised to us by Crown, in perpetuity.

http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/CJBC/welcome.htm

These Responses are published by the Chief Justice of British Columbia
personally and do not [necessarily] express the views of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia or of any other court, judge or judges unless expressly stated otherwise. These Responses are intended for public information and education: they are not judicial pronouncements and they have no precedential value.
 

His comments (below in silver) would appear to have little value at all, except for propaganda in the provocation of treason directly against the Crown, who is the protector of the Magna Carta, "for ever" and "in all places".

Response 168; December 14, 2001 - "Bill C-36" [NOTE: Justice Finch has since ordered this response removed, and it is no longer on his site but it is STILL recorded here 'WORD FOR WORD'. YOU BE THE JUDGE!]
 

Justice Finches words recorded [indented] below: Editors notes are in blue. Our emphasis added.

Comments of Chief "Justice" Finch:

"I have received an inquiry asking how a "repressive" piece of legislation
such as Bill C-36 (the proposed Anti-Terrorism Act) can be lawful "with our
laws being based on the Magna Carta".

For readers unfamiliar with legal history, the Magna Carta (or "Great
Charter") was created in 1215 by King John of England and later confirmed,
with many amendments, in the English Parliament by Henry III and Edward I.

It was the first instance that an individual's rights were protected against
the actions of the King. The Magna Carta is considered the foundation of
English constitutional liberty and among its chapters are provisions for the administration of justice and securing the personal liberty of the subjects of the realm. It is, however, a historic document and in Canada, the salient provisions of the Magna Carta are echoed in the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, commonly called the Charter.

Here you have it folks..... After giving an incomplete, yet mostly accurate, account of the purpose and history of our Great Charter of Liberties, our highest "court" judge implies that legal statutes and constitutional documents [in this case the eternal Magna Carta, or "law of the land"], can no longer be given any authority by virtue of it being "a historic document"...

The implication, therefore, is that no statute or constitution of Crown can be said to be in force, once it becomes part of our "history". Thus it is puzzling where our governments claim ANY AUTHORITY given that the BNA Act (1867) is likewise "a historic document" and is their sole source of claimed authority. [See related link here]

"Justice" Finch's comments, at their face, have to seen as some of the most troubling and profoundly ignorant in modern, dare I say it, history.

What possible relevance does the mere passage of time have to do with the rule of law? Particularly so when dealing with the context [or intent] of the Magna Carta, which was as an eternal and everlasting protection of fundamental rights, and administration of justice!

When Bill C-36 is enacted it will, like all other legislation in Canada, be subject to the provisions set out in the Charter. The Charter, as part of the Canadian Constitution, is the supreme law of this country. If the new Act, or any part of it, is thought to be in conflict with any provision of the Charter, the law can be reviewed in court to determine whether it is in fact lawful.
 

Well we already know what the BC "Court" of Appeal would say about this Act infringing our rights: "You have all these 'rights' until legislation interferes with them. Governments have the 'right' to create laws that infringe on certain rights" - B.C.C.A.

Clearly, the BC Court of Appeal has openly displayed total contempt for ALL rights (if in fact they understand their meaning at all) and are willing to use the lamest excuses possible to infringe YOUR unalienable rights...

For further discussion of the Charter, I direct viewers to chapters 1 and 8 of the Legal Compendium, which can be accessed by clicking on the "Legal Compendium" link on the courts' web site (courts.gov.bc.ca)."
 

[Whereas WE direct you to please go here < LINK >]

If Canada is still the "freest" country in the world, we are thereby ALL soldiers on the front lines of freedom... - unknown author.