|
Army agrees to pay Halliburton $2 billion for imaginary work The U.S. Army agreed to pay Halliburton’s KBR subsidiary nearly $2 billion for work that nobody can prove ever took place. The work was allegedly performed in Iraq and Kuwait under the Army’s LOGCAP contract, awarded to KBR in 2001 via competitive bidding. Under LOGCAP, KBR is responsible for military logistics, which includes feeding the troops, transporting military supplies, constructing military housing and offices, and maintaining laundry facilities. KBR is reimbursed by the Pentagon for its costs, then paid a fee of one to three percent of those costs. So far, KBR has received $6.4 billion for work under LOGCAP. Army auditors determined last year that 43 percent of the $4.5 billion requested by Halliburton under LOGCAP could not be verified under normal accounting procedures. In August, during the hotly-contested presidential campaign, the Army decided to withhold 15 percent of future reimbursements until KBR verifies when, how and to whom the suspicious expenses were paid. However, a few hours later the decision was abruptly reversed and the Army announced it would give Halliburton “more time” to explain itself. No reason was given for the abrupt reversal, except that the Army claimed it did not want to harm the troops in the field by withholding payments to KBR. The Army had given the company three deadline extensions to explain the suspicious expenses, but the deadlines quickly passed with no explanation that satisfied Pentagon auditors. The Army rejected claims by Democrats that the Bush administration had provided favorable treatment to KBR because of Vice President Dick Cheney’s past association with Halliburton. Last fall, the Pentagon’s Army Matériel Command and the Defense Contract Audit Agency recommended withholding 15 percent of KBR payments. Nevertheless, the Pentagon’s Defense Contract Management Agency praised the company for its “effective and efficient” accounting system. And finally, on Feb. 3, after months of internal Pentagon wrangling and three months after the presidential election, the Army made its final decision and rejected calls to withhold 15 percent of payments. In what the Washington Post called “a departure from normal policy,” the Army decided to ignore its own auditors and pay KBR for all costs, plus the standard one to three percent fee, without any explanation that could justify the company’s suspicious bills. The 15 percent withholding penalty could have cost KBR $60 million a month. “This is indeed great news for KBR,” said Andy Lane, chief operating officer of Halliburton, in a news release. “The Army and KBR have agreed to continue working closely together to resolve any remaining billing issues.” “This action is incomprehensible,” Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) said in a prepared statement. “Once again, the Bush administration is putting Halliburton’s interests above those of the taxpayers,” he said.
U.S. Weapons Poison Europe [Halliburton linked to DU] Leuren Moret / American Free Press | March 7 2006 A shocking new scientific study by British scientists Dr. Chris Busby and Saoirse Morgan asks: "Did the use of uranium weapons in Gulf War II result in the contamination of Europe?" High levels of depleted uranium (DU) have been measured in the atmosphere in Britain, transported on air currents from the Middle East and Central Asia. Scientists cited the U.S. bombing of Tora Bora, Afghanistan in 2001 and the "Shock and Awe" bombing during Gulf War II in Iraq in 2003 as one of the main reasons. In the 1950s the British government had established an air monitoring facility at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston to measure radioactive emissions from British nuclear power plants and atomic weapons facilities. Ironically, AWE was taken over three years ago by Halliburton, which at first refused to release key data as required by law to Busby. An international expert on low-level radiation, Busby serves as an official
advisor on several British government committees. He recently co-authored an
independent report on low-level radiation with 45 scientists with the
European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) for the European Parliament. The radiation measured in the atmosphere quadrupled within a few weeks
after the beginning of the 2003 campaign, and at one of the five monitoring
locations, the levels twice required an official alert to the British
Environment Agency. In the mainstream press, British officials have attempted to counter the
study by blaming the elevated uranium levels on "local sources." Anonymous
statements by government scientists used by the media thus far, however,
have been contradicted by evidence disclosed in the report. Atomic weapons facilities would be more likely to produce plutonium
contamination, which was not reported as a contaminant.
This wasn't the first time a noted scientist has discussed global pollution
from the use of DU. Dr. Jay Gould revealed in his book The Enemy Within that the British
royal
family privately owns investments in uranium holdings worth over $6 billion
through Rio Tinto Mines in Australia. The mining company was formed for
the British royal family in the late 1950s by Roland Walter "Tiny" Rowland,
who was known as the queen's banker and the master financial
manipulator behind billionaire Robert Maxwell's fortune.* The ubiquitous Halliburton just recently finished construction of a
1,000-mile railway from the mining area to a port on the north coast of
Australia to transport the ore.
Halliburton won the "greased pig" special Golden Piggy award today (an
annual Victoria celebration) for ripping off the US taxpayer.
*no-bid contracts courtesy of ex-CEO,still on the payroll, Cheney. *soft drinks at $45 a case *oil filters for $85,000 *abandoning vehicles if they got a flat and charging for a new vehicle..
The ultimate insult was Halliburton was caught with $1.4 billion in
Why Did Halliburton Buy An Oil Cleanup Company 8 Days Before The Oil Spill? - June 17/10 Goldman Sachs Sold $250 Million of BP Stock Before Spill -The Raw Story, June 2/10 The brokerage firm that’s faced the most scrutiny from regulators in the past year over the shorting of mortgage related securities seems to have had good timing when it came to something else: the stock of British oil giant BP.
BP chief Tony Hayward sold shares weeks before oil spill - June 05/10The chief executive of BP sold £1.4 million of his shares in the fuel giant weeks before the Gulf of Mexico oil spill caused its value to collapse.
. |