|
RCMP needlessly
shut off traffic to bridge - even to life-saving ambulance service!
THE SURREY LEADER - 29 Sept., 2004
By Julia Caranci - Regional Reporter
A pseudo-superhero managed to single-handedly close one of the busiest bridges
in the Lower Mainland for several hours last weekend.
Robin - also known as Hal Legere - donned safety ropes, a harness
and a mask at 4 a.m. Saturday and climbed to the top of the Pattullo
Bridge, which spans the Fraser River, linking Surrey and New Westminster.
Legere said it was still dark when he made the climb - he had a short nap at
the top while waiting for daylight.
The masked crusader then unfurled a banner. Two supporters, Batman and
Spiderman, waved signs in support of Legere while standing on a pedestrian
overpass below.
Legere and his sidekicks took part in the unusual protest as members of the
Canadian branch of Fathers 4 Justice, an organization founded in Britain that,
according to its website, pledges to mount a "non-violent direct action
campaign for the basic human right of children to enjoy an equal relationship
with both parents after divorce or separation."
Police were notified of the protest at 6:30 a.m. and quickly moved in,
closing down both sides of the bridge.
Legere said he chose the Pattullo because it is a busy crossing - he hoped to
reach as many people as possible, and was disappointed police closed the
bridge.
"That was their decision, not mine," he said. "There were no safety issues
here. We're not into people getting hurt."
Legere told a negotiator who scaled a fire ladder to reach him that he would
remain atop the bridge all weekend. However, he eventually agreed to come down
at about 11:30 a.m.
Surrey RCMP Const. Marc Searle said his members were duty-bound to place
themselves at risk to aid Legere, and anything could have happened.
["anything could have happened" SAY WHAT!!!
Is this a thinly veiled police threat against Mr.
Legere's life, OR is it a confession of police incompetence in dealing with a
peaceful protestor who they were readily and immediately aware was safely
harnessed to an inspection walkway?]
"Nobility of cause does not obscure social
responsibility," Searle said, adding the closure of the bridge was a frustration
for drivers and could have severely hampered the progress of emergency vehicles.
[SO WHY DID THE POLICE DO SO, THEN? At the
absolute most, the police would have had to block two of the four lanes, and
safely direct traffic over the bridge as they are [presumably] trained to do
when, for example, accidents occur on bridges or other traffic arteries.]
The action also tied up police, fire and coast guard
personnel for the entire morning.
[WHAAAA! In the meantime, police and government tie
up TENS OF THOUSANDS of families [the heart and core of our nation] and their
resources for YEARS in kangaroo courts, without lawful justification or
authority.
For example, the "For the Sake of the Children"
[house/senate] report on reforms to the family law system has been consistently
delayed by the Federal "government" since 1998; that is a SIX YEAR 'tie up'.
Does the RCMP "leadership" view the temporary delay
of weekend traffic [which they unilaterally perpetrated on the public
THEMSELVES] for a few hours as a "public safety matter", but see no issue in the
systemic abuse of 50 thousand children every year in Canada?
The fact of the matter is, the Police see no problem
in ROUTINELY tying up and delaying traffic for ALL MANNER of causes that they
presumably judge as "socially responsible", but which are mostly motivated by a
thirst to plunder cash from the public, yet now claim motives don't matter (?).]
A charge of mischief has been recommended to Crown
counsel.
[So are the police going to charge themselves for
needlessly closing the ENTIRE bridge; calling on the coast guard; and pulling
away a handful of officers from writing up speeding tickets or finishing their
coffee, given the fact that the evidence [which we just read] does NOT support
their decision to do ANY of those things, save perhaps for directing traffic
past one small section of a bridge?]
Legere said his actions were necessary to focus
attention on the issue of fathers' rights.
[Or more specifically, the fundamental RIGHT of ALL
people to exercise their RIGHT of liberty and freedom from illegitimate
[UNLAWFUL] government aggression. Which we now see the RCMP wholeheartedly
supports.]
After separating from his wife in 1998, Legere said it took $140,000 in legal
fees (on both sides) and four years to work out a satisfactory custody
arrangement for his children.
He wants legislation passed in B.C. that allows for shared custody by both
parents, provided they are fit, and in the absence of another agreement.
"This is going to continue and it's going to grow. This
is just the beginning."
Source www.surreyleader.com
See
how "Federal Government" is acting well beyond any legitimate authority it might
claim to form a federal government, and how we were fooled into excepting them
as having any authority or consent to govern us.
This is an illegitimate pirate government junta, with an illegitimate military
puppet police Gestapo enforcing their Roman Club rules and regulations on a FREE
people. WAKE UP!
Will Canada welcome superhero's battle for
justice?
Man Dressed As Super Hero Scales Bridge
September 25, 2004
He emerged from the mist around six this morning
determined to draw attention to the issue of child access. So, wearing a
costume any kid would appreciate, the middle-aged man dressed as Boy Wonder
Robin, as in Batman and Robin, dropped a banner and refused to budge.
 
The result was a backlog of traffic in both directions. Anyone wanting to take
the Pattullo was out of luck.
That included cyclists who, like the media, were kept so far away from the
scene, they couldn't even read the banner, and didn't know until we told them
what the protest was all about.
A similar stunt was pulled at Buckingham Palace just two weeks ago when a man
wearing a Batman outfit snuck past security and scaled a wall. He also
belonged to Fathers For Justice, a group bent on using non-violent civil
disobedience in order to make its point.
Robin, who tied up traffic, police, fire and the coast guard, couldn't be
talked down. Finally, after several cigarettes and hours of conversation with
a negotiator, a compromise was struck.
Police would load the media into a paddy wagon and deposit them close enough
to get the pictures that would get Robin's point across. It seemed like the
solution both sides had been seeking. But that lasted all of five minutes,
because according to Robin, the cameras weren't
close enough.
 
But police refused to give in to his further demands.
The media was once again corralled and taken away while police moved in on the
masked man, taking him into custody.
Five hours after the road block went up, the bridge was
re-opened. And with Robin under arrest, a spokesperson for Fathers For Justice
was left to defend the decision to inconvenience so many people.
[Speaking of "inconvenience": The "government" of
Canada alienates more than 50,000 children from their parents [overwhelmingly
Fathers] every year, through biased family law legislation.
In December of 1998, a joint Senate/House committee
recommended some two dozen reforms to "Family Law" that would have given
children greater access to BOTH parents. The Liberals are "still studying the
reforms".]
http://www.bcctv.ca/topnews.jsp?id=/news/stories/2004/09/news-20040925-01.htm
RCMP set up 'speed check' on same bridge as F4J
protest - pregnant woman dies.
Police release name of woman who died fleeing speed check
Global Broadcast News, Thursday, January 06, 2005
Surrey RCMP have released the name of a 30-year-old pregnant woman who was
killed in a car crash after she fled a police speed check Wednesday.
The unborn baby of Angela Cairns also died in the collision near the Patullo
Bridge [which is where police had set up their "speed check].
Police say Cairns had initially stopped for an officer
checking speeds, but then suddenly drove away before crashing head-on into a
tree.
http://www.canada.com/vancouver/globaltv/story.html?id=b47749d9-4807-40a5-a9e3-c7840918c5c6
Fast grown into militant force.
Tue 14 September, 2004
 
LONDON (Reuters) - Fathers 4 Justice, the campaign group
at the centre of
the latest royal security scare, has fast grown into militant force in the
two years since it was founded.
The group is fighting for a change in the law to include a presumption of
equality between divorcing parents.
It says the role of the father in children's lives must be recognised and
valued, and that family courts must penalise parents who flout court orders
allowing visiting rights.
It has at least 10,000 members in the UK who feel they have insufficient
access to their children and says that number is rising every day. It has
affiliated groups in the Netherlands, Australia and Canada and plans to
start up in the United States in October.
Following are some of the most high-profile protests the group has staged:
Dec 2002 - Dozens of protesters dressed as Santa Claus occupy the department
of the Lord Chancellor, the head of the judiciary, for 45 minutes.
Feb 2003 - Campaigners dressed as Elvis Presley present an inflatable heart
to the head of the family courts division.
Oct 2004 - Campaigner dressed as Spiderman barricades himself into a crane
over Tower Bridge. His protest gridlocked traffic for miles around.
May 2004 - Protesters who had gained access to parliament's public gallery
hurl condoms filled with purple flour at Prime Minister Tony Blair while he
is speaking.
July 2004 - Twelve protesters dressed as vicars and nuns storm a service in
York Minster.
Sept 2004 - Campaigner dressed as Batman scales a wall at Buckingham Palace
and stages a five-hour balcony protest.
Surrey Mayor wants harsh treatment for fathers who
fight for right to see their children.
THE NOW NEWSPAPER
29 Sept., 2004 'Boy Wonder' shuts down bridge
By Tom Zytaruk
The Surrey RCMP and New Westminster police are no superheroes for closing the
Pattullo Bridge on Saturday morning, says a man who dressed up as Robin and
perched on the bridge for nearly five hours to protest what he believes is
court bias in child custody cases.
Hal Legere - a.k.a. the Boy Wonder - was arrested after climbing onto the
girders high above the bridge deck at about 4 a.m. Saturday and unfurling a
large banner supporting Fathers4Justice.
"A charge of mischief will be recommended to Crown counsel," Surrey RCMP Sgt.
Dave Attfield said.
The traffic congestion that resulted enraged even Surrey Mayor Doug McCallum.
"He's just seeking publicity," said McCallum, adding that "thousands" of
motorists were inconvenienced by the stunt. "He should get treated as harsh as
the courts can."
But Legere doesn't agree.
"The police, in order to establish the justification to charge me with
something because of the political aspects of what I was doing, blocked the
bridge," he said.
But Surrey RCMP Const. Marc Searle said police had to close the bridge
because they couldn't tell what Legere planned to do.
"Safety is paramount," he said. "You always approach this with an abundance of
caution."
Fathers4Justice has been staging protests in the UK for some time now,
"campaigning for children's rights to see both parents." But the group is
new to Canada and the U.S. Some members dress up as comic book superheroes and
stage zany public protests against what they perceive to be
unnecessarily adversarial court systems that are biased against dads in child
custody cases.
Legere, 48, is a New Westminster steam engineer who shares custody of his
three sons with his ex-wife, following court battles he says cost about
$150,000 since the couple separated in 1998.
Asked why he dressed as Robin, Legere, Fathers4Justice co-ordinator for B.C.,
said "the whole idea that it came from is fathers are superheroes to their
children."
He said he was prepared to stay up on the bridge - with his 10 foot by four
foot banner - all weekend, until police told him to get down.
Legere said he showed police his safety harness and WCB-approved safety
lanyards, and suggested that they should move their cars as they were
causing "unnecessary blockage of traffic."
Legere said he expects similar stunts across the county if some changes aren't
made to the family court system soon.
"We're fed up with the crap," he said.
Maple Ridge resident Rob Robinson pulled the group's first protest stunt in
Canada in May, when he dressed up as Batman and perched atop a 120-foot-high
crane in Burnaby for 18 hours.
His stunt netted him a mischief charge. As for Legere, he said, "I thought
what he did was great. Spiderman's a-coming, that's all I can tell you."
Steve Osborne, national co-ordinator of Fathers4Justice, says fathers are
losing contact with their children all over Canada.
"We have no effective mechanisms to enforce access orders," he said in an
interview from St. John, New Brunswick.
*Publisher Steven W. Malkowich
smalkowich@thenownewspaper.com
Editor Corry Anderson canderson@thenownewspaper.com
http://www.thenownewspaper.com/issues04/094204/news/094204nn1.html
The mysterious case of the disappearing BBC webpage?
http://men.typepad.com/mens_hour/2004/02/the_mysterious_.html
In researching for related items about the last post
Fathers 4 Justice meet Minister as Civil Disruption Looms I looked for pieces on
Fathers 4 Justice. I found a webpage reported as on the BBC website but it
wasn't there. You get " Page Not Found ".So I went to the BBC search itself. BBC Search for
"fathers 4 justice". The third item down is Caped crusaders stand up for dads
except it isn't there. There's a cached version which includes "Police
crackdown".
The F4J protests have caused traffic chaos as the
authorities closed roads beneath the demonstrators on safety grounds.
In response, the police have begun a crackdown on F4J, arresting demonstrators
and raiding the homes of a number of those involved.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens had earlier said: "We have
got to put a stop to this type of event that causes incredible inconvenience
[and] costs an awful lot of money."
"The Spiderman stunt involving the crane also had the
added complication of health and safety implications," the police chief said.
Mr Stanesby seems unconcerned, though.
"I've been tortured, that's what it feels like," he
says. "If I was put in prison at the moment it'd be a relief from all this."
"I want to be a proper dad to my daughter, and I won't give up until I'm
allowed to be."
Looking around this is the only place on the BBC
website that mentions the raids. The arrests are mentioned elsewhere but not the
raids. The raids are mentioned in other places. Yahoo
Police raid "superhero"
fathers in protests.
Police said raids had been carried out at addresses in
London and in the south and west of the country
and London Evening Standard
Arrests halt fathers' rights demos
The group campaigning for the rights of fathers
separated from their children has called off protests planned for today after
police raids on the homes of its members.
Now maybe there's a minor problem with one webpage on
the BBC site or maybe the BBC doesn't want to say that the fathers are being
treated badly in any way, in other words it's just a bunch of men complaining
about nothing. Maybe I'm paranoid or maybe they're out to get me. Probably both.
Here is the
cached version on Google.

In his spare time, Jolly Stanesby dons a Spiderman
costume and climbs tall buildings - from 100-foot cranes to the Royal Court of
Justice.
It is a strange compulsion - but this is more than just a hobby.
Rather, it is a new form of political demonstration
carried out on behalf of Fathers 4 Justice (F4J).
F4J is calling for radical reforms of the ways child
access is decided, claiming courts are inherently biased against fathers.
The group has threatened ongoing civil disobedience
unless its demands are met, and irate fathers - all dressed as superheroes -
have been spotted dangling from tall buildings all over Britain in recent days.
Absolute nightmare
Mr Stanesby, speaking to BBC News Online after a week of protests at Plymouth's
Tamar Bridge and London's Blackwell Tunnel approach road, explained: "All dads
are superheroes to their kids."
The protests are not easy - he did not get much sleep
during his week on the Tamar Bridge - but he believes they are the only way of
bringing the issue into the spotlight.
"We live in quite a selfish society... we like to get
on with our own lives, but this affects everybody," said Mr Stanesby, from
Ivybridge in Devon.
Head to head
Matt O'Connor, who founded Fathers 4 Justice following a "pretty horrific
experience" in the family courts, agrees.
"The injustice was so shocking that I felt compelled to do something to try and
bring around a change in the law," he said.
Mr O'Connor says the current system is too adversarial.
"It puts you head to head - it's a winner takes all
thing," he said. "To prove who's the best parent you have to prove who's the
worst."
The attention won by F4J's caped crusaders has brought the group two meetings
with Lord Filkin, the junior minister for family justice at the Department for
Constitutional Affairs (DCA).
"What we want to see is a blueprint for family law,"
says Mr O'Connor.
"Family law doesn't just need tinkering with," he said.
"We're after a total and fundamental top-to-tail
revolution, to change the way we've been thinking about children and
families."
But while the DCA confirmed Lord Filkin had held
"private, low-key discussions" with F4J, it suggested major legal reforms
were unlikely.
Christina Blacklaws, chair of the Law Society's Family
Law Committee, concurred, saying that changing the law was less important
than educating and informing parents.
"It's not about fathers' or mothers' or parents' rights
at all, it's about children's rights, and that's embodied in the Children's
Act," she said.
"We would say that it's not the law that needs amendment, but maybe the
application of the law."
Ms Blacklaws said any changes would come about "not
because of the publicity that Fathers 4 Justice have caused, but because this is
a concern that anybody involved in the family justice system has".
"We all have the same concern, which is that the system
works well for children," she said.
Serious reform:
Some fathers' rights campaigners have refused to give F4J's radical
demonstrations their full support.
Jack O'Sullivan, a spokesperson for the Fathers Direct support group, said: "We
agree that the family court system needs serious reform."
But he added: "We're not advocating the reforms they're advocating."
"There is room for peaceful protest in our society," he
said. "But the danger is that this type of conflict makes it more difficult for
some people to listen to justified complaints."
[Why? Justice is non negotiable, and the "conflict" is solely the responsibility
of the courts, who are committing blatant assaults on our fundamental rights]
Police crackdown:
The F4J protests have caused traffic chaos as the authorities closed roads
beneath the demonstrators on safety grounds.
In response, the police have begun a crackdown on F4J, arresting demonstrators
and raiding the homes of a number of those involved.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens had earlier said: "We have got
to put a stop to this type of event that causes incredible inconvenience [and]
costs an awful lot of money."
"The Spiderman stunt involving the crane also had the
added complication of health and safety implications," the police chief said.
Mr Stanesby seems unconcerned, though.
"I've been tortured, that's what it feels like,"
he says. "If I was put in prison at the moment it'd be a relief from all this."
"I want to be a proper dad to my daughter, and I
won't give up until I'm allowed to be."
So police forces are invading the homes of Dads
fighting for their inalienable right to love and care for their children? And we
call ourselves civilized?
One wonders, therefore, when the first Dad will be shot
dead by blind and obedient
Government Police
Forces? Will the gloves come off, then?
11 Sept. 2004
'Spiderman' closes London Eye in child protest
URL:
http://tinyurl.com/52vom
THE TELEGRAPH (UK) 'Spiderman' closes London Eye in child protest
The fathers' rights campaigner who he staged a six-day
crane-top vigil
dressed as Spiderman at Tower Bridge has now brought the London Eye to a
halt.

David Chick gained access to the tourist attraction before 4am this morning by
claiming to be a workman, according to a spokesman for pressure group
Fathers 4 Justice.
He then climbed to the top of the 450-feet structure dressed as Spiderman in
protest at being denied access to his four-year-old daughter.
London Eye shareholder British Airways said it did not know how Mr Chick
evaded security but described the breach as "unacceptable".
A spokesman said: "We don't know how he gained access to the wheel. He
obviously got past security somehow but it wasn't as straightforward as
saying he was a maintenance man.
"It will be looked at as part of a full investigation by the London Eye
Company and we are taking this matter very seriously. We have extremely
stringent security measures in place and will be looking urgently at how he
got past them. It's unacceptable."
Mr Chick has not seen his daughter since March 1, 2003, after his former
partner denied him access - despite a court order allowing him two hours
each fortnight.
Today, he said in a statement: "My protest has moved forward, and has had to
move forward, because nothing has changed to right the wrongs of one parent
blocking an ex-partner access to their children in defiance of a court
order."
Mr Chick added he was not a "troublemaker or attention seeker" but was
simply trying to maintain a normal father-daughter relationship. "The
British justice system has completely failed my child and I," he said. "To
those who have been inconvenienced by my protest, I apologise.
Police were called to the wheel, billed as the world's highest observational
wheel, at 3.49am this morning.
The area has been cordoned off and the London Eye will remain closed while
the father-of-one continues his protest.

Photo: Spiderman, acting on behalf of Fathers 4
Justice, was seen on the lawn of the Capitol of British Columbia this summer.
English
'Bobbies' beating up grandmothers in effort to impose police nanny state!
| Sack
Parliament! At 1pm on Monday October 9th, up to one hundred
and fifty angry and concerned people converged on the Palace of
Westminster, to
sack
parliament. The plan was to
surround
parliament and cause parliamentary activities to cease. MPs, Lords
and civil servants would be prevented from
re-opening
|
If these issues are important to you, please help us maintain this site
with a donation of your choosing... Click 'make a donation'
button below. Thank You!
|