|


| |
Did Victoria Police wait in ambush to execute
driver of stolen vehicle?
It now
appears, since our first investigation, that this fatal shooting was in fact a
planned
ambush. So lets take a closer look at this incident, and piece together what
we know from
the facts given to us so far. You will notice some rather glaring disinfo,
and peculiar
actions, which support the contention that this was a planned shooting.
That this
shooting comes on the very heels of a secretive meeting
of the Mayor of
Victoria,
and chiefs of police, expressing plans for a "New York style of policing",
should be
disturbing to all residence of BC.
Notice off
the top that the discussion is framed around the issue of police chases,
rather than
as it actually was - a seemingly planned shooting.
Cops should pursue violent criminals only, police tactics expert
says
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 Times Colonist
- Rob Shaw
The Victoria Police
Department faced blunt questions yesterday about how a high
speed chase through a residential neighbourhood on the
weekend ended with gunfire and a fatality.
A U.S. expert in police tactics, who helped the RCMP
develop its policy on police pursuits, said Victoria should
follow the trend of other police departments and only chase
criminals suspected of violent crimes.
[Translation: More fatal shootings
will occur, with the alleged emphasis placed on "violent
crimes".... rather than a support of a no-shoot policy. On page
A3 of this same edition, the media tried to paint this apparent
car thief as potentially violent by stating he was "charged"
with assaulting a peace officer - charges, of course, are
completely different than a conviction - anyone can be charged
with anything. Then there's the fact that we have an article
from the police admitting to using SWAT team bandits in dealing
with
fake guns. Please also note
that the "expert" quoted by this paper is from the United States.]
"About 35 to 40 per cent of chases result in a crash," said
Geoffrey Alpert, a professor in the criminology and criminal
justice department at the University of South Carolina, who has
published studies on police pursuits.
"Most progressive police chiefs have realized it's just not
worth the risk of the public, and my family your family and
their families, to go chase someone who is wanted for running a
red light or stealing a car."
[Excuse us, but this was not simply
a "car chase", this was a fatal shooting of an unarmed driver of
a stolen vehicle that was pinned between TWO ghost cars driven
by experienced officers. By the admission of the police, the
highest speed this pursuit reached was approximately 70km/h,
after they "watched him enter the vehicle".]
Stealing is exactly what started a Victoria chase Saturday
night. Police noticed a stolen 1991 white GMC Jimmy SUV near
Topaz Avenue, west of Quadra Street. They watched 37-year-old
John Seguin enter the vehicle and tried to block his escape
with their cruisers. But he crashed through police, leading
officers on a chase through nine city blocks at speeds exceeding
70 kilometres an hour.
Seguin apparently swerved to try to hit three officers
standing near their cars at a blockade at Hillside Avenue and
Blackwood Street. The officers started shooting at the vehicle.
[No, he definitely did NOT swerve,
as the witness account shows, and as illustrated by the inserted
(below) Times Colonist map. Not only did the driver clearly
proceed in a straight line to avoid lane traffic, he would have
run into large traffic polls had he attempted to hit the
officers. The officers would have had plenty of time to avoid
the vehicle, which is logically the reason these experienced
officers ALL chose that very location to wait.

We must also remember that these
three officers were waiting, in ambush behind this cutaway
section of the building, for the driver to enter their line of
fire, and did in fact fire at least two shots.
We suggest that the driver was
struck with at least one shot at this time, and this likely
explains the erratic trajectory (sharply
to the left) of the vehicle
immediately thereafter.]
[Click pic for full map]
Police said Seguin drove the SUV past the blockade,
spun around, and sped back towards the officers who started
firing again.
[Look at the above map yourself; at
the location of the officers ACROSS THE STREET; and try to
visualize who moved towards who in this scenario. Clearly the
officers had to cross the street and start firing AGAIN at the
suspect, who was likely already shot and fatally injured.]
Seguin was fatally hit and died later in hospital. It
is the first time in the force's history that officers have shot
and killed a person.
The entire chase took fewer than two minutes. Typically,
police in Victoria and other jurisdictions call off a chase at
unsafe speeds or when it enters a neighbourhood where it could
endanger the public. But this chase was too fast for that, said
Victoria Police Chief Paul Battershill.
[Given the "chase" continued along
nine blocks of narrow residential streets, it is exceedingly
unlikely that the chase took "fewer than two minutes". In any
event, it was long enough for three officers to get out of their
vehicles, and find a safe place to wait for the suspect to
approach them, with their weapons already drawn.]
"When a chase starts, there has to be an analysis made of
what's taking place," he said yesterday. "But that generally
takes a minute or two to do and this was over in 90 seconds."
[It definitely took longer than 90
seconds.... Why the Victoria Police feel the need to openly lie
about this fact is not known at this time.]
That should have been enough time, Alpert said, adding that
perhaps the outcome will spur Victoria to set a more restrictive
policy on pursuits.
"It may well bring your chief to his right mind to avoid
these things later on," Alpert said. "The problem is, you can't
predict what the guy fleeing is going to do. If he's going to
escape, at what cost? Why would you chase him into a
residential neighbourhood?"
Three officers fired approximately 12 shots from their
service pistols to kill Seguin. Some of the bullets hit his
vehicle. But they also struck a bus shelter, a parked car,
and a moving car..
Battershill said it is a balanced decision to fire
weapons.
[It is also a "balanced decision" to
wait for someone to come towards you with your guns drawn, and
then empty 12 or more shots in a dense residential
neighbourhood.
Will it be the balanced decision of
the people of BC to end their monopoly of service? To fire the current set of thugs and
hire real peace officers, who not only have respect for the
lives of those they are paid to serve, but also respect those citizens who use
force 'within the law' to defend themselves with firearms. There
is ONE LAW FOR ALL, and if the above shooting was "just" in their
eyes, they owe the people of this province a huge apology for
their attitude toward the publics' use of similar force.]
"It's arguable that vehicle hurtling down Hillside Avenue
would pose an even greater risk to the public," he said. "You
have to balance that out. Had he continued he could have very
likely run down members of the public or killed someone in a
fatal crash."
An independent investigation of the shooting will be led by
Supt. Brad Parker of the Delta police.
[Prediction: No charges will be
filed or recommended, despite the fact that bystanders where
nearly killed in this apparently needless shooting. Shooters
pictured below. Constable Watson (far right) and Johnston are
SWAT members.]
  
Below is source link of map used in above illustration.
http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/gallery/05FEB-PoliceChase.pdf
_____________
Click this link to see how this same department treated one of its
citizens despite showing infinitely more restraint then they are
apparently capable of.
See Also:
Our Police Crashes section |
Victoria Police couldn't even be
straight with owner of vehicle.
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 Rob Shaw -
Times Colonist
At first, Rose
McFadden was relieved when Victoria police called and told her
they'd recovered her stolen 1991 GMC Jimmy. But it had been in a
"little" accident, an officer warned her. "He said,
'We've located your vehicle and it was in a little bit of a
pursuit and it's been in a little bit of an accident,'"
McFadden recalled yesterday.
It was no small accident.
Her stolen GMC Jimmy was hurtled down Victoria streets by a
thief caught in a high-speed police chase Saturday night. The
chase ended when the driver, John Seguin, rammed McFadden's SUV
through a police barricade. He used it as a high-speed battering
ram, trying to run over three officers before they fired 12
shots, killing Seguin.
[Just for the record (AGAIN) the
vehicle was never used to try to run over the police. Have a
look at the map in the above story, and pictures below, and you
will see the officers not only were waiting for the vehicle, but
had several places to secure their safety - including a clump of
trees and light poles.]
"I'm horrified," said McFadden, who has worked in the
circulation department of the Times Colonist for 16 years. "It's
just so horrible to look at the TV and there is your vehicle
involved in all this."
Her GMC Jimmy was stolen from a Robbins Parking lot on
Douglas Street sometime between 8 a.m. and noon on Jan. 30 while
McFadden was at work.
She called police and the vehicle was flagged as stolen.
It's unclear where the GMC Jimmy went from there. But
Victoria police spotted it at around 8 p.m. Saturday on Topaz
Avenue, west of Quadra Street. Officers watched Seguin get
inside and drive away. When police tried to block him, Seguin
crashed the SUV through the police cruisers, setting in motion a
chase that lasted nine city blocks and culminated in the first
fatal shooting by officers in Victoria police history.
McFadden said she's confused as to her next step, and how her
insurance company will compensate her for a vehicle that is now
a key piece of evidence in a massive police investigation.
The department said yesterday it had impounded the SUV but
had yet to search and examine it. McFadden isn't sure she wants
to drive the vehicle again. Someone died in it. It is marked
with bullet holes. And it was rammed by police cruisers into a
hydro pole.
 
Driver of stolen vehicle pulled slowly onto curb to
avoid blocked lanes, Officers were waiting behind clump of trees
visible in left photo... They then crossed the street and fired
several more times at John Seguin.
If you look closely, you can see police
vehicle tracks near where officers were dropped off to wait in
ambush. Nearest tracks are believed to be outside wheel of SUV.
Note in below pic that none of the
SUV's tires were shot, as would be the case if police were
trying to disable vehicle, and MOST NOTABLY, there are NO BULLET
HOLES in the front windscreen.

Puncturing tires with spike belt (or
bullets) insures vehicle is incapable of significant speed, and
stray bullets are safely embedded into asphalt or soil. Though
this picture is not the best view, there is every indication
from witnesses that all the tires on this vehicle were intact
and fully inflated (Note relative height of police bumper in
left foreground). If we
are to believe the story of the Victoria Police that this driver
drove toward officers, why are there absolutely no bullet holes
in the front windshield of this vehicle?
|
Not only is the system not sound, it isn't
independent, or mandatory........
Victoria police rethink high-speed chase rules
Force looks at restricting pursuits to serious offences
Sunday, April 01, 2007 - Times Colonist Rob Shaw
 |
| CREDIT: Darren Stone, Times Colonist |
| Victoria Const. Mike Darling is not engaged in a real pursuit for this photo illustration that dramatizes the rush of a high-speed chase, with the addition of creative visual effects by Times Colonist photographer Darren Stone. |
|
The rules on how and when Victoria police can chase criminals are about to change dramatically.
Police Chief Paul Battershill said his force is overhauling the policies it uses to govern high-speed pursuits.
"We're potentially looking at only chasing for various serious offences," Battershill told the Times Colonist.
"There are certain serious offences I think police need to continue pursuing for. But we're certainly going to look at where we should be pursuing for serious offences, what those serious offences are, and we're going to look at making supervision of pursuits very clearly defined."
The changes come nearly two months after Victoria police shot and killed the driver of a stolen SUV during a pursuit through residential streets. Police say the SUV swerved to try and run over three officers. It was the first time Victoria police had shot and killed a person, and the force weathered some criticism over whether officers should have continued the pursuit through residential streets and fired 12 shots, some of which hit passing cars and a bus shelter.
But the pursuit policy review is not a result of that case, Battershill said. The department had been looking at making changes prior to the chase, he said.
Nonetheless, officers would likely not have chased the SUV that night if the force had policies that restricted officers only to serious criminal cases, the chief said.
As it stands now, Victoria's policy is based on provincial emergency vehicle regulations. They allow officers to start a pursuit if they think someone has committed, or is about to commit, any type of offence (that includes refusing to stop for police).
But as they wrestle with an increase in young people stealing cars and refusing to stop for police, a number of departments in Canada and the United States have set limits on what kind of crimes justify a pursuit.
Generally they've decided major criminal offences such as robbery, murder and assault are worth a chase, while thefts, speeding, and stealing a car are not.
The Justice Institute of B.C., which trains police officers, estimates 38 per cent of chases end in crashes.
Court rulings have also become a motivation for change, as judges appear less likely to give police the benefit of the doubt on judgment calls made during a pursuit.
Vancouver police Sgt. Sheila Sullivan, an expert in pursuit policies, said it's her opinion that pursuits should be restricted only to serious crimes, to help prevent officers from getting sued.
Battershill thinks her analysis is "bang on." He invited Sullivan to speak about policy changes to his senior officers in late February.
Battershill also spoke about the emerging changes to police pursuit policies at a law enforcement conference in Edmonton Friday.
Victoria police recorded 82 high-speed pursuits between 2001 and 2005, roughly twice the number by Saanich police. In comparison, Vancouver recorded 515 chases. Victoria had the fifth-most pursuits out of the 11 municipal police departments in B.C. The RCMP did not provide their pursuit numbers.
Victoria should have new draft rules on chases done in April and submitted to the police board for approval in May, Battershill said.
But even with the legal chill rolling through police departments, Battershill still sees a value in chasing down criminals.
"I think if you stop all pursuits you will have a situation potentially where someone will be able to commit and continue to commit some really grievous offences and police would be really powerless to act," he said. "I don't think, for our society, that's right.
"If somebody is armed and taking a child out of a residence and leaving in a vehicle, the police have to stop them."
|
The "inquiry" begins.... and not surprisingly, the cops are lying whenever their lips are moving... Officer involved claims he fired because his life was in danger, yet explains [as we noted earlier] the TOTAL lack of bullet holes in the front windscreen as bad shooting.... Folks my mother can hit a windshield from 20 feet away, so read the highlighted material from the following Times Colonist newspaper coverage.. Police gunfire narrowly missed passing motorist - Nov 15/2007
Inquest hears details of police shooting that killed man trying to elude them in stolen vehicle Ayers, the shift supervisor of B Watch, told Coroner Norm Leibel and a three-woman, two-man jury that he had parked his police SUV on Blackwood in an attempt to stop a police pursuit that began minutes earlier at Topaz and Quadra. When the Jimmy and two pursuing police cars mounted the sidewalk, Ayers was directly in their path. He feared for his life and fired his Glock three times in the direction of the Jimmy but none hit the vehicle. Yeager testified that one of those bullets hit an electrical utility box, another other hit the police car behind the Jimmy and the third was never found. [full report] How do you hit a police car BEHIND a vehicle you CLAIM is heading directly for you, such that you "fear for your life"???? And lets safely assume that being police officers, they have had some kind of pistol training, and do actually know how to fire those fancy semi-automatic weapons the tax payers paid [1,000$ each] for. Lets examine a bit more of this "testimony" to see if any of it fits OUR conclusions, based on the evidence we already went over. Those conclusions being that the police who fired were TO THE SIDE of the vehicle when they fired, and THEREFORE not in danger of being run over. [In danger of shooting each other, maybe]
Seguin died in hospital after one of the .45-calibre bullets fired from Johnston's Glock handgun hit him in the head. Another bullet flew through the Jimmy's open windows and struck the front fender of a red Toyota Yaris driven by Francois Blouin of Victoria.
If you can tell us how someone can be in danger of being run over by a vehicle, and still manage to fire a bullet through that same vehicles "open windows", we'd like to hear from you.... Surely such a theory rivals that of the JFK magic bullet theory, yet we're going to go out on yet another limb, and predict none of these officers will be criminally charged with excessive use of force, or endangering the public... etc. The inquest is expected to wrap up today when the jury will rule whether Seguin's death was natural, accidental, suicide, homicide or undetermined. The jury may also make recommendations to prevent similar deaths from occurring in similar circumstances.
Opps... The jury ruled it was a "homicide"... So that must mean charges will now be laid right? Inquest jury wants police pursuit changes - Nov 17/2007
Recommendations made in case of man shot dead during chase The jury of two men and three women, which heard more than three days of testimony, determined last night that the Feb. 3 death of John Seguin, 37, was a homicide, defined by the coroner's office as a death due to injury intentionally inflicted by the action of another person. They made seven recommendations to prevent similar deaths, including calling on police to look at ways to disable a stationary vehicle prior to active pursuit. It also recommended that police develop a clear policy governing termination of pursuits and ensure it's communicated to all involved officers. [full report] Here's a recommendation from BC Revolution: Hold "peace officers" accountable to the same laws they claim to enforce, and therefore charge the police involved in this unlawful use of deadly force, aka HOMICIDE? Too radical? Or does it sound more like the proper interpretation of 'rule of law' and/or 'equal application and protection of the law'. What about the interests of public safety they are always babbling about? So, what do the police have to say about this error in judgement that nearly killed several innocent bystanders?
Yesterday, Victoria's acting police chief defended the actions of his officers.
"Everybody is a Monday-morning quarterback," said Bill Naughton. Officers are expected to use their training in the best way possible, he said, "and I'm convinced that happened here."
Like we keep telling you: they just don't get it..... and they are not going to! We're going to have to find a better way to enforce the law and defend ourselves.... One of those ways is for neighbourhoods to employ a Sherriff system where the public elects the "highest officer" in charge of the department every two years; and independent investigations and prosecutions of police who break the law are carried out with full public discloser. Clearly these people are not "peace officers".... and clearly they have no intention of improving anything, and couldn't care less about the public they [superficially as it turns out] took an oath to serve. --------------------------------------- Lest you need more proof of their contempt for rule of law, and their oath of service, check out the following..
A Victoria police officer who shot a man during a struggle in 2005 spent the last two and a half years on paid leave - receiving as much as $172,000 - but resigned the day he was supposed to go before a disciplinary hearing.
The police department is refusing to say why Const. Mike Miller resigned, but the civilian police complaints watchdog says, in the absence of public information from Victoria police, it is considering the unprecedented step of calling its own public hearing into the matter.
Public details about the shooting have been sketchy.
The department yesterday backed away from a previous pledge for public transparency, saying an investigation into the shooting is part of the B.C. Police Act complaint process, which is not subject to Freedom of Information rules and therefore is not public information.
[..........]
Meanwhile, the department has asked for 19 additional officers next year because it says it is understaffed. [ full report]
Go here for more info on the strange goings on within the Victoria Police Department. .
|