|
Lee-Anne Goodman
Canadian Press Tuesday, March 08, 2005 From the first word of the fatal shootings of four RCMP officers in rural Alberta last week, the spotlight was turned on marijuana grow-ops -- the dangers they posed, the tougher laws needed to combat them. Within hours, politicians, police, pot activists and even the father of killer James Roszko pointed both to marijuana itself and the illegal trade in the drug as major players in the deadly chain of events. RCMP officials said from the outset that their men were killed in a grow-op raid. William Roszko said his son was never the same after he started smoking "that crazy dope" as a teenager. The Marijuana Party said the shootings underscored the need to legalize pot and wipe out the black market. Police and some politicians argued just the opposite, saying the tragedy proved that any move to legalize weed was madness. It now appears the focus on grow-ops was misplaced. In fact, RCMP Commissoner Guiliano Zaccardelli said in an interview with the National Post on Monday that he was too quick to make the link to marijuana and had acted on incomplete information. Alan Young, a lawyer and longtime proponent of legalizing marijuana, said it was an inappropriate knee-jerk reaction. "It was shameful and disrespectful both on the side of the state and on the side of the activists, who felt they had to respond to the state," said Young. "Four police officers were dead and it was alarming to see it turn into a propaganda play right off the bat. There is really nothing about this case that should cause someone to develop public policy one way or the other. This case is about how to deal with psychopathic people who have long histories with the law." Young isn't alone in his distaste. Letters to newspapers and callers to TV and radio shows buzzed Monday along similar lines. In a letter to the Edmonton Journal, a reader scoffed at Premier Ralph Klein's appeal to the federal government to drop any plans to decriminalize marijuana in the wake of the incident. "This idiot would have killed over a littering ticket," Allan Wood wrote, referring to Roszko. "For Klein to push his agenda on pot this way is ridiculous." A caller to CBC Newsworld echoed that sentiment: "The issue is about a crazy guy with a gun," he said. Indeed, it now appears growing marijuana was only one of the problems that tormented Roszko. Police have downplayed the fact that the 46-year-old convicted pedophile with a long history of violence and a high-powered assault weapon had a substantial grow-op on his property. [Ooops... Where did this talk of "assault weapons" suddenly come from? Assault weapons were TOTALLY banned in Canada over a decade ago, and were sent to the grinders. There IS, however, one group in Canada that has ready and easy assess to such weapons, and that is the RCMP/CSIS, and Military - BOTH of which were at the remote scene that day. [See photos of police openly carrying fully automatic weapons at a high school] If it turns out that the RCMP officers were shot
with an assault weapon, we have yet ANOTHER piece of evidence that suggests
the deaths of these officers was committed by the police themselves. Is this
where this talk is heading? Sure appears that way....] [And just look at the lengths these criminals are
willing to go to protect it.]
Last Updated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 CBC News
EDMONTON - RCMP are still trying to
piece together [their lies concerning] what happened in a shed on a farm near
Mayerthorpe, Alta., on March 3, when four Mounties and another man were shot
to death. [It should be noted that it took WEEKS for the police to put forward this NEW claim that the "dead shooter" was carrying THREE weapons - one of which they now assert was a FULLY automatic "banned" weapon. Now they want us to believe he snuck onto the heavily guarded property carrying THREE weapons on his person, including TWO large rifles. Why wasn't his "new" weapon shown to media, or even referred to, on or about the date of the shooting? Is the media pressuring for and demanding access to autopsy reports for this latest admission by police? This new information lends significant credibility
[along with the other facts already established] to the idea being put forward
that this shooting was an inside job, and that these officers were in fact
murdered by CSIS members with automatic weapons, for the purpose of increasing
legislative powers and public sympathy to a department recently exposed for
their ties to
drug syndicates and pedophiles.] [If "gunfire was heard", we should have known THAT
DAY if automatic weapons had been fired.] [Notice now we are being told an officer actually
saw Roszko with THREE guns, yet the media was told [for weeks thereafter] he
was armed with a bolt action hunting rifle.] [What "speculation" was he putting to rest with his comment about an "outpouring of support"? Was he suggesting the media reported support for the shooting of these officers, or was perhaps this a Freudian slip as to the motive of the shooting? No doubt it will take months...... because it will
likely take them months to get their chain of lies in order. No doubt this
process will take the "Public Safety" minister a good deal longer, which is
why she seems to be suddenly mute on the issue.]
Please help us defend your Freedom and Liberty with a donation of your choosing... Click 'make a donation' button below. Thank You! |