Newsmax October 19 2002
Light water nuclear reactors provided to
North Korea under a 1994 deal negotiated by the Clinton
administration have the capacity to generate enough nuclear fuel to
produce
almost 100 nuclear bombs per year, a 1999 congressional study
warned.
The study was undertaken by the House North Korea Advisory Group,
chaired by Rep. Benjamin A. Gilman, R-N.Y. Members of the panel
included Rep. Doug Bereuter, R-Neb., then chairman of the
Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, Rep. Porter J. Goss, R-Fla.,
chairman of Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and
Christopher Cox, R-Calif., then chairman of the Republican Policy
Committee.
In its November 1999 report to the speaker of the House, the
Advisory Group sounded the alarm about North Korea's nuclear weapons
program, cautioning that the "Agreed Framework" that President
Clinton had promised would derail Pyongyang's nuclear weapons
program had backfired.
"Through the provision of two light water reactors [LWRs] under the
1994 Agreed Framework, the United States, through KEDO, will provide
North Korea with the capacity to produce annually enough fissile
material for nearly 100 nuclear bombs, should the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea [DPRK] decide to violate the
Nonproliferation Treaty [NPT]," the Advisory Group warned.
The report explained:
"If the 1994 Agreed Framework is implemented and two LWRs are
eventually built and operated in North Korea, the reactors could
produce close to 500 kilograms of plutonium in spent reactor fuel
each year; enough for nearly 100 bombs annually if North Korea
decides to break its obligations and reprocess the material."
Officials in Pyonyang acknowledged this week that North Korea had
indeed broken its obligations under the Clinton accord and are now
rapidly proceeding with a full-blown nuclear weapons program.
The Advisory Group further cautioned:
"Although the 1994 Agreed Framework was essentially aimed at
eliminating North Korea's ability to make nuclear weapons, there is
significant evidence that nuclear weapons development is continuing,
including its efforts to acquire uranium enrichment technologies and
its nuclear-related high explosive tests."
In one of the Advisory Group's most chilling observations, the
report warned that since the implementation of the Clinton accord,
North Korea had made significant progress in developing an
intercontinental ballistic missile fleet capable of targeting the
U.S. with weapons of mass destruction:
"In the last five years, North Korea's missile capabilities have
improved dramatically. North Korea has produced, deployed and
exported missiles to Iran and Pakistan, launched a three-stage
missile [Taepo Dong 1], and continues to develop a larger and more
powerful missile [Taepo Dong 2].
"Unlike five years ago, North Korea can now strike the United States
with a missile that could deliver high explosive, chemical,
biological, or possibly nuclear weapons. Currently, the United
States is unable to defend against this threat."
The report also features a bar graph that shows a direct correlation
between increases in Clinton administration aid and North Korea's
enhanced ICBM capacity.
The Advisory group also contended that the "Agreed Framework" had
made North Korea "the largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid in the
Asia-Pacific region."
"In an astonishing reversal of nine previous U.S. administrations,
the Clinton-Gore administration, in 1994, committed not only to
provide foreign aid for North Korea, but to earmark that aid
primarily for the construction of nuclear reactors worth up to $6
billion," the House report noted.
To read the full Speaker's Report by the House North Korean Advisory
Group, go to: http://www.house.gov/international_relations/nkag/report.htm
Go to original....
Related links:
U.S. Helps America-Hating North Korea Build Nukes
United Press International August 8 2002
Rumsfeld was on ABB board during deal with North Korea
Swiss Info February 24 2003
The two faces of Rumsfeld
London Guardian May 9 2003
N. Korea Has Already 'Mock Nuked' Alaska - With US Government Help
New reports about threat of missile launch
omit key facts
|