Shocking 911 Evidence strongly
suggests attack was part of elaborate Hoax.
Socrates taught his students that the
pursuit of truth can only begin once they start to question and analyze every
belief that they ever held dear. If a certain belief passes the tests of
evidence, deduction, and logic, it should be kept. If it doesn't, the belief
should not only be discarded, but the thinker must also then question why he
was led to believe the erroneous.
"Not only do we have a
right to know, we have a duty to know what our Government is doing in our
name... If there's a criticism to be made today, it's that the press isn't
doing enough to put the pressure on the government to provide information." -
Walter Cronkite - On the 3-28-02 Media Matters Show on PBS.
Factoid: Most of the people killed at the Pentagon were those involved in investigating the "disappearance" of over two (2) TRILLION dollars from the pentagon budget. Had the plane simply continued on a relatively straight path, rather than perform an exceedingly difficult 270 degree high speed aerobatic manoeuvre, the crash would have killed dozens of high ranking pentagon brass and government officials. [See Flight Data Recorderfor more]
Before we get started, lets just have a quick review of what we are looking at right out of the box....
8:20 am : "Flight 77" departs from Dulles Airport. Some 20 miles from the Pentagon.
8:50 : Last radio communication with "flight 77". Now some 280 miles from the Pentagon.
8:56 : Transponder contact lost. Now some 335 miles from the Pentagon.
"Flight 77" disappears from all radar screens a couple of minutes later, somewhere near the Ohio border.
Perhaps to give the Air National Guard/USAF a sporting chance, the hijackers wait till they are about 350 miles away from their target before turning back. The north tower of the World Trade Center has already been hit by an aircraft - so plenty of clues exist that would tend to alert the air force of a 'real world' problem.
9:00 : "Flight 77" turns and heads for the Pentagon (Washington DC). Now some 370 miles away from the Pentagon.
9:37 : "AA77" allegedly crashes into the southwest side of the Pentagon after firstflying PAST the pentagon, and performing a manoeuvre that very nearly exceeds the design limits of the aircraft, and would subject any actual pilots to well over four g's, by putting the aircraft into a highly dangerous steep dive from 7,000 feet, whereupon our pilot [who struggled to control a Cessna] levelled off at some 10 to 15 feet above ground - and continued on in level flight for approx 300 - 400 yards at 530 miles per hour.
Factoid: As a point of reference, there is a 60 mile "restricted air" radius around Bush's Texas ranch house... as this is the distance assessed by NORAD as being sufficient to intercept any aircraft flying into the area... Now go back and compare the distances and times that were effectively drawn around the pentagon.
Getting the picture? ....and we haven't even gotten to the meat of the problem yet.....
Here's another clue the media may not have told you, but fits perfectly with the big picture: Post 911 anthrax attack, used to intimidate media and select elected officials, traced back to unique pentagon strain. History Channel report....
Here is a video clip from CNN
coverage on the morning of 9/11. CNN reporter Jamie McIntyre says he inspected
the Pentagon site and it is obvious no 757 crashed there. His exact words are
as follows below......
JAMIE MCINTYRE: From my close-up
inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the
The only site, is the actual side
of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that
you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large
tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around
which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the
Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors
have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately. It wasn't until almost
about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the
The above video (and transcript) has now become of heightened importance in
light of Jamie McIntyre's recent comments on CNN [May 16/06] following the
court ordered release of more ambiguous pentagon video footage.
Mr. McIntyre now claims, that on the day of September 11/01 he did see plane wreckage (including a cockpit no less!!) at the front of the pentagon. Either Mr. McIntyre is one of those rarest of individuals who's memory actually improves years after witnessing an event first hand, or we have more evidence of media smoke and mirrors from the usual players. He also states that he "did not feel or know that a plane hit the pentagon till I actually saw it on CNN".... yet no such video was aired by CNN. Mr. McIntyre offers us his proof that the plane that hit the pentagon must have been
flight 77 for the "simple fact" that it took off that morning...... and "cell phone calls" were made from it. WATCH HIS COMMENTS HERE
HERE to see our analysis of this "new" video, and the media's rather curious attempt to draw conclusions for the viewer..... plus a video simulation of what it would look like if a 757 had been captured by Pentagon video crashing into the front of the building.
The video, recorded by a security camera at the
Doubletree Hotel in Arlington, was released to public interest group
Judicial Watch and others who filed a lawsuit seeking the tape and other
videos from that day.
CNN filed a Freedom of
Information request for the video in February 2002, after the manager of the
hotel disclosed its existence to CNN Senior Pentagon Correspondent Jamie
McIntyre and said it had been confiscated by the FBI. CNN's FOI request was
denied because at the time the tape was considered evidence in the
investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, who has since been convicted.
[What it does seem to show, however, is
that the aircraft that crashed into the pentagon was coming in at very VERY low
altitude, as opposed to the 45 degree angle 'steep dive' trajectory put
forward by some government conspiracy theorists, as part of their 75 to 90
foot hole story. Otherwise you should be able to clearly make out the belly
of a 757 over the highway overpass in the foreground.]
Lets get this "plane made 75 foot hole" fallacy
out of the way first, because people like "Popular Mechanics" are (as
amazing as it sounds) still using this bogus bit of info as one of the
"facts" they claim as debunking the 911 truth movement.
As pointed out on other pages of
BC REVOLUTION, in order to pervert "free nations" into police states, governments
must dupe the public into acceptance of oppressive "war measures" type
legislation, through fear mongering and misdirection. Some now suggest there is
hardly a more profound example of this than the events of September, 11 2001.
Following the events of '911', the
governments of Canada, Britain and the United States quickly passed legislation (without
debate or democratic process) granting
unprecedented police, military and government powers. Powers that included
massive budget expenditures, substantial restrictions of our blood bought liberty, martial law legislation, and the
complete erosion of our historic common law 'due process' in protecting us from malicious
It is now more possible than ever before
for government officials to label citizens as "terrorists", to incarcerate such
people for indeterminate periods, and even use torture until a
"confession" is gained to self-servingly "justify" their actions: thus the
perfect weapon of the tyrant for sealing his power was put in force. [See
Link for more]
Evidence is now coming forward that while
Islamic terrorism does indeed exist, the whole truth
of 'who are the
terrorists' is being well hidden by arrogant
and criminal government agencies, whose concern is not that of "public safety
and security", but of total government influence and control.
To what lengths are these government
criminals and terrorists willing to go?
Well, it appears from the evidence
submitted by independent websites, eyewitnesses, government whistle-blowers and even scientific
laboratories, they are indeed willing to kill innocent men,
women and children, in order to to turn Canada, Britain and the US into full scale police states.
Steve Patterson, 43, said he
was watching television reports of the World Trade Center being hit when he
saw a silver commuter jet fly past the window of his 14th-floor apartment in
The plane was about 150 yards away, approaching from the west about 20 feet
off the ground, Patterson said. He said the plane, which sounded like the
high-pitched squeal of a fighter jet, flew over Arlington cemetery so low that
he thought it was going to land on I-395.
It was flying so fast that he couldn't read any writing on the side. The
plane, which appeared to hold
about eight to 12 people, headed
straight for the Pentagon but was flying as if coming in for a landing on a
nonexistent runway, Patterson said.
"At first I thought 'God, there's a plane truly misrouted from National,'"
"Then this thing just became part of the Pentagon ... I was watching the World
Trade Center go and then this. What's next?"
He said the plane, which approached the Pentagon below treetop level, seemed
to be flying normally for a plane coming in for a landing
other than going very fast for being so low.
Then, he said, he saw the Pentagon "envelope" the plane and bright orange
flames shoot out the back of the building.
By Barbara Vobejda,
Washington Post Staff Writer
Lon Rains, editor of “Space News,” was
quoted as saying “I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced
it was a missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.”
Don Parkal said, “A bomb had gone off.
I could smell the cordite. I knew explosives had been set off
Donald R. Bouchoux, 53, a retired Naval
officer, a Great Falls resident, a Vietnam veteran and former commanding
officer of a Navy fighter squadron, was driving west from Tysons Corner to the
Pentagon for a 10am meeting. He wrote: At 9:40 a.m. I was driving down
Washington Boulevard (Route 27) along the side of the Pentagon when the
aircraft crossed about 200 yards in front of me and impacted the side of the
building. There was an enormous fireball, followed about two seconds later by
debris raining down. The car moved about a foot to the right when the shock
wave hit. [Note: Jet fuel ignition can not create shockwaves, which
are caused by air pressure waves that exceed the speed of sound...
ONLY explosives can cause shockwaves.]
John Bowman, a retired Marine lieutenant colonel and a
contractor, was in his office in Corridor Two near the main entrance to the
south parking lot. "Everything was calm,' Bowman said. "Most people knew it
was a bomb. Everyone evacuated smartly. We have a good sprinkling of
military people who have been shot at."
A building not hit by an
aircraft falls perfectly down on itself in 6.5 seconds
Notice the area directly above the center of impact shows two windows with
flame retardant clinging to UNBROKEN panes of glass. Are we to believe the
force of the "757" tail slamming to this area at hundreds of knots didn't even
break the glass, or leave a dent in the adjacent concrete?
Rumsfeld's "Freudian" slip of the tongue on what hit Pentagon...
They [find a lot] and any number of terrorist efforts have been dissuaded,
deterred or stopped by good intelligence gathering and good preventive work.
It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any
technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every
place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic
knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and
similar (inaudible) that damaged
the World Trade Center.
The "official" government conspiracy theory on the pentagon
impact has been that it was all carried out by a group of "cave dwelling Arab terrorists" piloting a
100 tonne Boeing 757 [Flight AAL 77] However, as you follow the evidence provided on this
website, it will become clear that their position is unsupported by all
available substantive evidence. Instead, the evidence provided by the Pentagon itself,
as well as independent sources, OVERWHELMINGLY suggests they are deliberately hiding the truth of the "Pentagon crash".
We will then (on other pages) examine the entire
series of events that happened that day, and see whether or not a
similar pattern of deception emerges.
"We must speak the truth about terror. Let us
never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of
September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from
the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty." - G.W. Bush speaking
before the UN General Assembly 11/10/2001
What about the debris, or shocking lack thereof, at the impact
As people who have studied the handful of
material (from the Pentagon) have noted, ALL of the parts shown in
photographs approved and released by the Pentagon are small, portable
chunks. Parts possibly consistent with the missile or "small drone aircraft" theory, and totally inconsistent with that maintained by the US government that it was a 100 ton commercial 757 airliner. No passenger luggage, engines, landing gear, tail section, was found, nor were readily identifiable on or about the
time of the incident.
Almost miraculously, the
'Armed Forces Institute of Pathology' under the rather curious code name of "Operation Noble Eagle" claimed it identified ALL but five of the bodies of Flt 77; however NO ARABS were listed among those found, nor apparently were they even listed on the passenger manifest.
photo [taken September 13/01] shows what appears to be a SINGLE small
or "turbine" [approximately 22 -24 inches MAX*
in diameter, when we rough
measure to the leg of the person in frame (note slope of ground)] which is not
only too small to have come from
either of the TWO massive High-bypass engines used on the Boeing 757,
which uses a multiple interconnected series of LOW PRESSURE type internal turbine discs from
29 inches, and main turbine fan of 78.5 inches: Even if we assume the smallest turbine of the 757 engine was
mysteriously the only
part to survive IT IS THE WRONG TYPE OF ROTOR - (please note engine housing
which appears same diameter suggests high pressure, LOW-bypass engine - the EXACT opposite design of that fitted on a 757).
[*: to measure the approximate size of the disc, take a calliper from the 9 and 3 o'clock position, then measure against the fireman's leg, which should come to his knee height. That makes the disc [assuming a 6 foot man] at no more than 24 inches. Measure your own heel to knee height for confirmation.]
Below photo is of
high pressure LOW-bypass Rolls Royce Engine used in Global Hawk, or similar
aircraft, and shows relative size of engine.
However, it should be
noted that it is inconceivable that only one disc would remain intact (as photo
shows) while ALL other discs disintegrate into the ether of nothingness! These
rotors (thousands of pounds worth) are contained in a contiguous series of attached turbines.... so where are the others
(or at the very least the fragmented discs) if this was one turbine of the many within a Rolls Royce 757 engine? [Still
think this could be 757 engine part? Then keep reading for the clincher that
puts the debate in perspective, and raises huge problems for those supporting
the government position.]
[It should be mentioned here that some have claimed this part is from the APU, however
this part could not be from the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) as those discs are from 8 to 12 inches in diameter. The APU is merely
a source of initial power for starting the larger turbines, and electrical power when
main engines are off. The 757 uses the Honeywell GTCP331-200, and for some reason detailed pictures of this APU are seemingly impossible to find on the internet. The Airbus uses a nearly identical size model APU, so we've included the dimensional diagram below left to help you get a better idea of the size of these units.]
Even with transmission housing, generators, oil reservoirs, air intake, etc.. attached, the total combined height of the unit is less than thirty inches or 76 cm... The disc assembly front housing plate is the round plate directly in the center of the above photograph (marked with the red square) and is approximately ten inches in diameter. Picture at right gives us a colour illustration of the horizontal disc assembly. As you can see these discs are very small indeed, and nothing approaching the size of the disc in the aforementioned pentagon debris pictures.
The above pictured singlerotor in the pentagon debris photo is, as stated, consistent with many "pure jet" high
compression jet engines associated with noisy military aircraft, as opposed
to modern commercial jet airliners, which use high bypass "low compression"
engines which are compliant with mandatory low noise requirements. [Below
pic is of "low noise" high-bypass commercial jet engine. Note
turbines are part of series of serial turbines, so why do we only see one
turbine in debris photo?
Also note the housing is dual layer (to permit airflow), and are of greater diameter to
largest turbine housed in assembly.This is not even close to what one sees in the pentagon
In simple terms: Military jet engines are designed to
accelerate a relatively small amount of air VERY quickly; whereas
commercial airline (high bypass) engines accelerate a relatively large
amount of air more slowly. This results in substantially lower engine
noise, as well as greater fuel economy.
most important fact to consider, however, is the fact that this photo is taken
at the EXIT hole at the rear of 'C' ring [which is little more than ten
feet in diameter] and raises the question as to how either 757 engine [which
are mounted WELL OUTBOARD ON THE WINGS] could have squirreled its
way through the 16 foot [or less] entrance hole, then through five more layers
of 18-inch 'bomb reinforced' concrete? That is nine feet of
concrete in total, and the government conspiracy theorists would have us
believe the cabin caused this hole! Laws of Physics demand that such a feat is TOTALLY
The engines should still be somewhere
at the front of the Pentagon, where they would have each impacted some 25
or so feet of (either side of) the entrance hole, of 'E' ring, OR, left TWO separate and unique holes of their own and
some part of the Pentagonouter wall - as these engines comprise the most dense and
durable parts of the aircraft, and EACH
engine weights in excess of 4.5 tons [around
9,000 pounds each], and are constructed
largely of high strength, high
density, 'high heat tolerant' metals such as titanium and cobalt alloy steel. If anything would have left a hole, it
was the engines, not the cabin body, which is essentially just a
lightweight 'low density' pressurised aluminium-alloy tube.
Still confused? Well imagine throwing an empty
beer can at one piece of cinder block - then a D-cell battery at another.
Which is going to have the greatest potential to leave a hole? AND assuming
the impossible were to occur, and only the beer can made a hole, how would two
batteries strapped either side of the can get through the hole made by the
beer can? Simple physics tells us the government is lying its $^% off.
Picture says a thousand words - note relative
positions of engines to cabin [fuselage] body.
An estimated 5 ft of engine is below
Above diagram fromhttp://physics911.net/missingwings.htmillustrates the impossible physics required for
either outboard engine to end up at exit hole.Ever play
pool? Where should the engines have been found?
Not only is the fuselage penetration
indicative of the test of strength between the wall and the plane, but the
wall would have been weakened by being split open by the fuselage, making it
easier for the wings and tail as they followed. Yet as the pictures show, the
wings (and engines) curiously did not penetrate.
The [left] image gives a 'birds eye' view of the
of a 757 [with 125 foot wingspan] flying directly over the annex
(building in the foreground) and then knocking over light-poles at the
Washington Blvd. overpass (toward far right of photo)
before striking the Pentagon.
[See also the video at 'Part III' of this site showing
The hypothesis of "Dick Eastman" (that a small
"killer jet" was responsible for the actual impact to the Pentagon) is most
consistent with eyewitness accounts by all civilian observers, including
testimony of Lagasse, Riskus, and Campo - placing the "757" well to the northof
the lamp pole damage; as well as the early testimony [from Steve Patterson]
indicating that a much smaller plane than a "757" was seen close to the impact
If these eyewitness accounts are correct, then the
"757" allegedly seen over the gas station and over Washington Blvd, could not possibly
be the same as the cause of the damage to the Pentagon.
such as Sam Danner, have stated that they observed lamp poles falling
onto the highway seconds AFTER the plane hit the pentagon, suggesting the
poles were part of the staging of events as witnessed by others.
Testimony may, of course, have been simply
confused, " intentionally planted or coached" (either to lend credibility to the
"official story" or "muddy the water" as the CIA trains as part of
standard disinformation), and it is also possible witnesses saw a 757 (at a higher
altitude), then saw an explosion at the Pentagon and collated all the
visual data in order to build a consistent mental image of traumatic and
horrifying events which took place very quickly, and fit their REPEATED images
of planes hitting the Trade Towers on the television just moments beforehand. Eye witness testimony can
often be amongst the LEAST reliable in crisis situations, as numerous
experiments into this phenomenon have determined.
Another difficulty with the official
government account is how a heavy commercial airliner managed to maintain a
continuous extremely low altitude and ever downward flight path at VERY high speed. Below are
estimates for the aircraft altitude [sea level] at various checkpoints.
0.35 miles (Naval Annex) -- 230 feet
0.6 miles (gas station) -- 125 feet
0.75 miles (1st lamp post) -- 70 feet
0.95 miles (Pentagon hit) -- 50 feet ASL (above sea level)
This could of course have all been cleared up if the
FBI had not confiscated numerous (over 80) tapes showing the craft, or
deliberately removed the frames
from the closed circuit tape that was released "unofficially".
Private video of
an aircraft actually crashing into the pentagon is hardly going to contain info
vital to 'national security' - UNLESS of course the truth is likely to bring
down a corrupt criminal government agency. Seems clear to us that the
governments' failure to disclose the truth is the ONLY possible threat to national
All aircraft produce what is referred to
as "ground effect" when landing, or at low altitude [within about
one/half lengths (0.5) of wingspan or 60 feet]. So if "the pilot" was trying hard to push
the airplane down as close to the ground as possible [at a VERY high speed,
in fact], the craft would have encountered this
increase of lift and
decrease of drag
experienced by ALL low-wing aircraft. This effect makes it very difficult to
land an airplane until all excess speed has been "bled off" [by flaring the plane
at landing, using flaps and spoilers], and if these "pilots" were following the same "full throttle"
kamikaze attack as their "twin tower" comrades, this would have been an
absolutely impossible feat of flying. Not one of the alleged hijackers was
even able to master flying a 1500 pound Cessna 150, let alone a 100 tonne
state-of-the-art twin engine commercial aircraft!!
Let it suffice to say that it is physically impossible to fly a 200,000-lb
airliner 20 feet above the ground at 400 MPH
In other words, if this were a Boeing 757 as reported,
the plane could not
have been flown below about 60 feet above ground at 400 MPH. (Such a
maneuver is entirely within the performance envelope of aircraft with high
wing-loadings, such as ground-attack fighters, the B1-B bomber, and Cruise
missiles-and the Global Hawk.)
Furthermore, a review of the alleged "engine fingerprint" evidence ("impacts"
to a mobile generator, a chain-link fence and a concrete vent structure in front
of the Pentagon) reveals another possible problem with the "official" flight
path. In order to comply with the lateral trajectory path over the Naval Annex
[see above Annex photo], the plane needed to make a left turn in order to strike the
light poles, just missing the adjacent overhead highway sign and much taller VDOT camera pole to its right, and allow for
"the engine" to hit the steam vault
retaining wall and chain link fence adjacent to the electrical generator. This
means that between the Naval Annex and the light poles, the plane needed to
level out much of its turning bank angle to avoid hitting the ground with its
left wingtip, and do this while also pulling out of its simultaneous
dive as discussed just above, all in the space of a few seconds.
Hey Pentagon idiots - where's the video of this fantastic feat
of flying? Is the reason we still haven't seen a tape, from your CGI guys, that
not even they can fake a film showing this?
of this necessary left turn arc further to the south, it becomes physically
impossible for the plane to pick up both the 5 light poles and the
engine impacts with the retaining wall and the chain link fence, and have the
centerline of the 757 fuselage impact column 14.
In this paper, I call for a serious investigation
of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not
just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned
cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission
reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of
all three buildings. And I present evidence for the
controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available
data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of
the reports funded by the US government.
You have reached the website hosting a documentary with groundbreaking testimony that sufficiently proves the 9/11 official story false. There are many aspects of 9/11 but this movie focuses specifically on the events as they happened at the Pentagon.
This testimony was obtained by Citizen Investigation Team in a persistent effort to find the truth in light of a myriad of questions. We contacted as many previously published eyewitnesses we could obtain numbers for and we canvassed the neighborhoods of Arlington on foot in a quest to find unpublished eyewitnesses. Our goal was to establish the final flight path of the plane before it reached the pentagon as seen by the eyewitnesses.
Robert M. Bowman was the Director of Advanced
Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, and is a former United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology.