These crucial frames are precisely the ones they would need to cut in order to prevent a clear view of the object that struck the pentagon.
Yet another piece of noticeable disinformation: the video's time clock [left video, below] has been tampered with to confuse the actual time of the "attack" on the Pentagon. Time stamp not only shows 5:37 in the evening, but "date" shows September 12, 2001. Rather strange, indeed, for a security camera used for protection of one of the most secure buildings in the US to be so completely off the mark.
Also curious is the apparent addition of some height to the right side box [near far right highway cone of both videos] which, in the few frames that were not apparently censored by the CIA, is precisely in front of the object that struck the Pentagon. If one examines this "higher box", seams are clearly visible, and the top corner of the box is offset and does not match its lower portion. If it has not been tampered with, it is indeed an unfortunate coincidence that this box prevents us from getting a good look at the object that struck the pentagon.
Video at right has been cropped and stabilized.... Note missing "crucial second '20' in clock timer of left video. These missing frames are VERY compelling evidence that this video DID NOT SUPPORT the official government explanation, or they would be the first to WANT us to see the plane!
Some of the things we CAN establish from this video is that the "plane" was flying VERY low to the ground, and was in level flight just fractions of a second before impact. This fact refutes the theory put forward by some government conspiracy nuts that the 757 was in a steep 45 degree bank and hit the pentagon from a steep dive from above. Clearly this "plane" is low and level, as we see no wings visible, and at such an altitude a steep turn would be impossible due to the wings striking the highway and/or grass long before it reached the pentagon. The 757 has a wingspan of approximately 120 feet - do you see any wingtips in the photos? [See below photos of scale representation for better visualization of this HUGE problem.]
This certainly would explain why these frames have been "lost" : they are those on which one can recognize that it this not a Boeing 757 passenger airliner which hit the pentagon! The first to put forward this theory was the French journalist Thierry Meyssan : according to him, something (a missile, a remotely piloted fighter) was directed on the pentagon, in order to increase the gravity of "the attack of Bin Laden" on 9/11, the pentagon being a military target.
Picture shows same frame as above pic, and shows what we would see if it was a 757 caught by frame in "19th" second of security camera video.
Bars in picture denote 10 yard squares.
Note how much of the aircraft would have protruded into our field of vision if in fact the plane was a 757.
Diagram in front of actual building shows [to scale] how a 757 airliner would compare to the structure hit on September 11, 2001 [grey insert of left photo].
Make up your own mind... Even the CIA can't alter the laws of physics.
Very
little ground fire is visible despite the fact that over 8,000 gallons of slow
burning jet kerosene fuel would have pooled where wings [location of main fuel tanks]
"sheared off" due to impacting building.
Picture caught approximately three seconds after impact shows large fireball projecting up from well inside pentagon, rather than upward and back from the face of the building.
Firefighters reported that the fire inside the building was exceedingly hot [which is consistent with an explosives fuelled fire, and inconsistent to a kerosene fuelled fire] and we note, again, from pictures shown before the collapse of the roof that there was very little fire outside. Some firefighters and pentagon employees reported the smell of cordite. [See picture below]
Please note the colour of this "fuel" ignition flash... It is inconsistent with the colour at which kerosene based jet fuel ignites... Note below comparisons. Pic on left is of Boeing 720 "Crash in the desert" while pic on right is of Japan airlines Boeing 737, which BOTH show a typical light yellow flashover as the common colour emitted by kerosene. Whereas the aircraft fireball photographed at the pentagon was a definite red colour. [This anomalous evidence adds support to military experts who stated they smelled explosives, and first suggested a car bomb had exploded.]
It must be highlighted that If the plane was on its way from the East Coast to the West Coast it had to still be about 3/4 full which means it would have had approximately 8600 gallons of fuel [kerosene] onboard - and this fuel is carried primarily in the wings.
This picture shows firefighters shortly after arriving to lay down dry powder fire retardant [note grass is barely covered] yet fire is internal, and there simply is no fuel fire on the grass directly in front of impact hole [as noted by red box highlight]
This picture was taken just a few minutes after impact...
We see scattered burning of peripheral construction materials, but no sign of the massive burning of 8,600 gallons of kerosene.
Note also the grass is completely undamaged, and there is not a single sign of wreckage from anything resembling a 757.
This was also the opinion of 'Johnny on the spot' CNN reporter JAMIE MCINTYRE, who reported LIVE from the pentagon crash sight just moments after the crash.... Click HERE to watch this 1.3 meg video in High Bandwidth High Quality - or Here for 110k Low Bandwidth Lower Quality.
747 Jet Crosswinds Top Gear Test - What happens to vehicles subjected to jet blast from wide-bodied aircraft? <[Click link for Video Clip]
Former Pilot Says 'Jet Blast' Dismissal Doesn't Fly
Pentagon Explosions At 9:32 - 'Jetliner' Impact At 9:45
Other surveillance tapes exist... Guess who is preventing us from seeing them?
surveillance video camera pointing in the direction of the impact zone. This
camera would have viewed the entire event. That should have ended the
controversy even before it started. Nothing could be more dramatic or
conclusive than images of an American Airlines jet plowing into the side of
the Pentagon. However, according to the owner, Mr. Jose Velasquez: "I've
never seen what the pictures look like. The FBI was here within minutes and took the film." ["Three Month On, Tension Lingers Near the Pentagon," by Bill McKelway, National Geographic News, Dec. 11, 2001,]
What a wonderful example of FBI efficiency. The government says it had "no
idea" that terrorists would use airplanes to attack commercial or government
buildings. Yet, the FBI was on the spot within minutes of the Pentagon strike, ready to seize private videos.
Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough are reporters for The Washington Post. Ten days after the Pentagon attack, they published the following report:
A security camera atop a hotel close to the Pentagon [the Hilton] may have captured dramatic footage of the hijacked Boeing 757 airliner as it slammed into the western wall of the Pentagon. Hotel employees sat watching the film in shock and horror several times before the FBI confiscated the video as part of its investigation. ["Video of Attack" by Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough, Inside the Ring, Sept. 21, 2001]
If this report is accurate, then we know that something
important was
captured on this tape. Otherwise, the employees would not have watched it in
"shock and horror". The FBI has NEVER revealed the
images from this camera, nor any of the other private videos.
The Virginia Department of Transportation is housed close to the Pentagon.
It has several surveillance cameras positioned to monitor freeway traffic
along Interstate 395. There is reason to believe that one of those cameras
captured an image of the incoming aircraft as it flew only a few feet above
frightened motorists. The company that manufactures and maintains this
closed circuit TV system is the Arinc Company. The following announcement
appears on its web site:
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) CCTV system used to
manage the Northern Virginia freeway network had cameras in place that
observed the September 11 crash site at the Pentagon. This CCTV system and the
VDOT Smart Traffic Center were used as a command center for emergency responders
and cleanup and recovery crews following the
incident.[
http://www.arinc.com/products/rail_control_ctr/cctv_systems.html ]
It may sound like science fiction, but the prospect that suicide bombers and hijackers could be made redundant by flying robots is a real one, according to experts.
The technology for remote-controlled light aircraft is now highly advanced, widely available -- and, experts say, virtually unstoppable.
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.
Click Here for full report....
______________________
Also see below links......
Quick and Secure Paypal donations....
.